ReviewHealth science reports2024
Kinetic changes of gait initiation in individuals with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review.
Review in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lower-limb biomechanical alterations across movement tasks in individuals with chronic ankle instability: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2026Review
- Visual dependence, postural stability during repeated unilateral standing tasks, and quality of life in adults with chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- A Gait Sub-Phase Switching-Based Active Training Control Strategy and Its Application in a Novel Rehabilitation Robot.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Kinetic changes of gait initiation in individuals with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review.Health science reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Gait initiation (GI) in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI) has shown differences in the center of pressure (COP) and muscular measures compared to healthy controls. Some studies reported that these alterations appeared when GI was with the affected leg, while others indicated that they occurred when GI was with the non-affected leg. This systematic review aimed to understand kinetic and muscular differences between individuals with CAI, healthy controls, and the affected and non-affected legs of individuals with CAI. Methods: PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases (1990-2023) were searched using the Population, Exposure, Comparator, and Outcome measure. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The outcome measures were the peak and rate of COP displacement in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions, and resultant plane during phases 1, 2, and 3 of COP trace during GI and the duration of each phase. The other measures included the onset time of the tibialis anterior and soleus muscle activity between individuals with CAI, healthy controls, and the affected and non-affected legs of the individuals with CAI. The studies' quality assessment was conducted based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. Results: Five studies were included in the final evaluation. The results of included studies showed, individuals with CAI spent less time during phases 1 and 2, as well as a shorter peak of COP displacement in the lateral direction during phase 1 compared to healthy controls, regardless of whether the GI was with the affected or non-affected leg. Conclusion: Individuals with CAI have probably adopted a strategy involving adjusting the peak of COP displacement to manage internal sway while in a single-leg stance. Overall, there was no comprehensive conclusion about differences between the two legs in individuals with CAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.