Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479236›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

No cardiac phase bias for threat-related distance perception under naturalistic conditions in immersive virtual reality.

Felix Klotzsche, Paweł Motyka, Aleksander Molak, Václav Sahula, Barbora Darmová, Conor Byrnes, Iveta Fajnerová, Michael Gaebler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felix Klotzsche *Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-2481
Paweł Motyka *Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5575-5601
Aleksander MolakFaculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Václav SahulaNational Institute of Mental Health, Center for Virtual Reality Research in Mental Health and Neuroscience, Klecany, Czechia.
Barbora DarmováNational Institute of Mental Health, Center for Virtual Reality Research in Mental Health and Neuroscience, Klecany, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-9583
Conor ByrnesFaculty of Philosophy, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany.
Iveta FajnerováNational Institute of Mental Health, Center for Virtual Reality Research in Mental Health and Neuroscience, Klecany, Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-3029
Michael GaeblerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4442-5778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have found that threatening stimuli are more readily perceived and more intensely experienced when presented during cardiac systole compared with diastole. Also, threatening stimuli are judged as physically closer than neutral ones. In a pre-registered study, we tested these effects and their interaction using a naturalistic (interactive and three-dimensional) experimental design in immersive virtual reality: we briefly displayed threatening and non-threatening animals (four each) at varying distances (1.5-5.5 m) to a group of young, healthy participants (

Indexed as

electrocardiogramemotionheartinteroceptionnaturalistic neurosciencevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39479236
PMCPMC11521594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.