ReviewPatient preference and adherence2024
Novel Bispecific T-Cell Engagers for the Treatment of Relapsed B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Current Knowledge and Treatment Considerations.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Survival: Measuring Treatment Tolerability with Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Lymphoma Immunotherapy Era.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2026Review
- Single injection of modified self-amplifying RNA encoding a CD19 bispecific T cell engager mediates long-term malignant B cell clearance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Advancements in Nanomedicine for Precision Management of Lymphoma: Mechanisms, Diagnostics, and Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Practical Guidance for the Expanded Implementation and Provision of Bispecific Antibodies for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Across Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Bispecific Antibodies, Nanobodies and Extracellular Vesicles: Present and Future to Cancer Target Therapy.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Rheumatoid arthritis unmasked: the power of B cell depletion therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the novel treatments focusing on the class of bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL), the two most prevalent subtypes of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL). After a brief outline of these diseases, the difficulties in the management of relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease are highlighted. There are currently 4 main BiTEs showing promise in treating R/R B-NHL-glofitamab, epcoritamab, mosunetuzumab, and odronextamab. Although the rational of their mechanism of action is similar, there are significant differences in their respective clinical trial design, reported outcomes, and the final FDA approvals. Considerations for selecting a specific BiTE therapy, including treatment duration, cost, administration route, adverse effects, and impact on quality of life, are also discussed. Patient preferences and shared decision making should be acknowledged by healthcare providers. Finally, the importance of personalized treatment strategies and ongoing research to optimize outcomes in the evolving landscape of R/R B-NHL therapy cannot be overstated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.