Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479214›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Comparison of two commercial broth microdilution panels for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: Thermo Scientific™ Sensititre DKMGN vs. Beckman Coulter MicroScan NMDRM1.

Antoine Aupaix, Kamila Lamraoui, Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos, Ahalieyah Anantharajah, Alexia Verroken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. High-risk clonal expansion of IMP-producingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antoine AupaixMicrobiology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Kamila LamraouiMicrobiology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Hector Rodriguez-VillalobosMicrobiology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Ahalieyah AnantharajahMicrobiology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Alexia VerrokenMicrobiology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using broth microdilution (BMD) is usually the reference method to obtain accurate minimum inhibitory concentrations and optimally manage infections with resistant organisms. Several commercial dry BMD are available for AST in clinical laboratories. Materials and methods: Two commercial BMD panels for testing of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria were compared: the Thermo Scientific™ Sensititre DKMGN and the Beckman Coulter NMDRM1, for 17 antimicrobial agents. Results: A total of 207 isolates were tested: three ATCC strains and one NCTC strain, six quality control strains from the Belgian National Antimicrobial Committee, and 197 clinical isolates, including carbapenem-resistant Discussion: Overall, the categorical agreement (CA) and essential agreement (EA) were both above 90%, but several useful antibiotics for the treatment of multi-resistant organisms showed CA and EA under 90%, that is, meropenem, imipenem, and colistin for

Indexed as

broth microdilutionCarbapenem resistancecomparison of methodsGram-negative bacteriamultidrug-resistant

Identifiers

PMID39479214
PMCPMC11521802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.