ReviewCureus2024
Role of Necrosectomy in Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparison of early and late drainage interventions in necrotizing pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic Versus Surgical Management for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis and Walled-Off Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Has the Step-Up Approach Improved Prognosis in Severe Necrotizing Acute Pancreatitis?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical, Radiological, and Endoscopic Features of Pancreatic Pseudocyst and Walled-Off Necrosis: How to Diagnose and How to Drain Them.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotizing pancreatitis (NP) is a severe complication of acute pancreatitis, characterized by necrosis of pancreatic and peripancreatic tissues, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. The role of necrosectomy, the surgical removal of necrotic tissue, in the management of NP has evolved over the past few decades, moving from early aggressive surgical intervention to a more conservative and stepwise approach. This narrative review explores the historical perspectives, current practices, and future trends in the role of necrosectomy in NP. Early studies favored open surgical debridement; however, high mortality rates associated with early intervention prompted a shift towards minimally invasive techniques, delayed interventions, and the "step-up approach," combining percutaneous drainage with minimally invasive surgery. We also review the indications for surgery, optimal timing, and various techniques, including video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement and endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy. The review highlights the benefits of these strategies in reducing complications, improving patient outcomes, and minimizing hospital stays. Ongoing research into patient selection, timing, and procedural refinement will continue to shape the role of necrosectomy in NP management. Understanding the evolving role of necrosectomy is crucial for optimizing care and reducing the burden of this life-threatening condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.