Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479133›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Sex Differences in Neuromuscular Adaptations Following 12 Weeks of Kettlebell Swing Training.

Evaldo Rui T Santos Junior, Belmiro F De Salles, Ingrid Dias, Roberto Simão, Jeffrey M Willardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evaldo Rui T Santos JuniorGymnastics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRA.
Belmiro F De SallesGymnastics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRA.
Ingrid DiasGymnastics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRA.
Roberto SimãoGymnastics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BRA.
Jeffrey M WillardsonHealth and Human Performance, Montana State University Billings, Billings, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there are sex differences in strength, power, and muscular endurance gains following a 12-week kettlebell swing protocol. Twenty-eight men (29.4 ± 7.3 years; 176.4 ± 6.2 cm; 80.1 ± 11.0 kg; 146.0 ± 22.3 kg in deadlift; 1.8 ± 0.2 kg/body mass deadlift relative strength) and 25 women (32.3 ± 5.5 years; 162.5 ± 7.5 cm; 66.2 ± 9.7 kg; 92.4 ± 17.3 kg in deadlift; 1.4 ± 0.2 kg/body mass deadlift relative strength) participated in this study. Measures of strength in the deadlift, power in the countermovement jump, muscular endurance in the deadlift, and workout of the day (WOD) were obtained before and following six and 12-week time points. Both sexes showed pre- to post-test differences in strength (p < 0.001; one repetition maximum (1RM) improvement of 12.6% for men and 11.7% for women), power (p < 0.001; jump height improvement of 12.9% for men and 6.8% for women), and muscular endurance deadlift test (p < 0.001; improvement in deadlift repetitions of 24.5% for men and 29.2 for women), and only men improved performance in DT WOD (p < 0.001; WOD improvement of 21.3% for men and 1.3% for women). Furthermore, men had greater gains in the power test (p = 0.02) and in the DT WOD endurance test (p = 0.04). Kettlebell training appears to be an effective strategy for increasing strength, power, and endurance in both men and women, but considering the lower responses in power and DT WOD, other strategies should also be considered to optimize women's results in these tests.

Indexed as

crossfitkettlebell swingphysical fitness trainingresistance trainingsex differences

Identifiers

PMID39479133
PMCPMC11524543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.