Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479123›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Effectiveness and Safety of Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis in Older and High-Risk Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.

Najeeb Ullah, Vaishnavi Kannan, Osman Ahmed, Sunitha Geddada, Amir T Ibrahiam, Zahraa M Al-Qassab, Iana Malasevskaia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Najeeb UllahGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Vaishnavi KannanGeneral Surgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Osman AhmedInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sunitha GeddadaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Amir T IbrahiamInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Zahraa M Al-QassabInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Iana MalasevskaiaResearch and Development, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a prevalent surgical emergency, particularly among elderly individuals who present with high perioperative risks. While early cholecystectomy (CCY) is the standard treatment, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is proposed as an alternative for high-risk patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of CCY versus PC in managing AC among elderly and high-risk surgical patients. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ScienceDirect, Europe PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EBSCO Open Dissertations, from July 1 to 15, 2024. Studies published from January 2019 to July 15, 2024, were included if they focused on patients aged 65 and older or those classified as high-risk surgical candidates. The review encompassed 72,366 participants across 22 studies, predominantly observational. Key outcomes assessed included postoperative complications, readmission rates, recurrence of cholecystitis, and mortality rates. This study highlights the need for individualized treatment strategies for managing AC in elderly populations. While CCY remains the preferred approach when feasible, PC offers a critical alternative for high-risk patients. Future research is necessary to optimize outcomes for this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

acute cholecystitischolecystectomycholecystostomycomparative effectivenesselderlyhigh-risk surgical patientsmortality ratespostoperative complicationssafetysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39479123
PMCPMC11524642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.