Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39479069›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Transpedicular Corpectomy in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Single-Center Series.

Gervith Reyes Soto, Daniel Vega Moreno, Monica Serrano-Murillo, Carlos Castillo-Rangel, Alberto Gonzalez-Aguilar, José Rodrigo Meré Gómez, Pablo Isaac Garcìa Fuentes, Bernardo Cacho Diaz, Manuel de Jesus Encarnacion Ramirez, Vladimir Nikolenko and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unilateral biportal endoscopic transpedicular intrabody cage augmentation for a metastatic spinal tumor with pathologic fracture: a technical note and case report.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gervith Reyes SotoNeurosurgical Oncology, Mexico's National Institute of Cancer, Tlalpan, MEX.
Daniel Vega MorenoNeurosurgery, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, MEX.
Monica Serrano-MurilloNeuro-oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Mexico, MEX.
Carlos Castillo-RangelNeurosurgery, Servicio of the 1ro de Octubre Hospital of the Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, MEX.
Alberto Gonzalez-AguilarNeurointerventional Surgery, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, COL.
José Rodrigo Meré GómezPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clínica de la Columna Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico City, MEX.
Pablo Isaac Garcìa FuentesNeurological Surgery, Hospital San Juan de Dios Guatemala, Guatemala, GTM.
Bernardo Cacho DiazNeurological Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, MEX.
Manuel de Jesus Encarnacion RamirezNeurological Surgery, Russian People's Friendship University, Moscow, RUS.
Vladimir NikolenkoHuman Anatomy and Histology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, RUS.
Tshiunza M CherubinNeurosurgery, Clinique Ngaliema, Kinshasa, COD.
Miguel Agustín Amador HernándezOrthopaedics, Hospital Central Militar - Traumatología y Ortopedia, Hospital General de Mexico Cirugía de Columna, Mexico City, MEX.
Nicola MontemurroNeurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction The role of separation surgery in managing symptomatic spinal metastases has been increasing in recent years, and it represents a crucial part of the definitive management of this condition. Methods We report on a series of seven patients treated at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico using minimally invasive approaches to perform transpedicular corpectomy. The goal was to obtain a margin of tumor-free tissue, enabling the completion of oncological treatment with radiotherapy. Results We collected data from six cases. The mean age was 61.2 years. Surgical outcomes were good in 83.3% of patients. Ranging from minimally invasive instrumentations to total or partial corpectomies, these procedures achieved their intended function of generating healthy neural tissue free of tumor. This ensures that the radiation gradient does not affect this tissue. No surgical complications were reported. The objective of these surgeries was to establish a radiotherapy or radiosurgery regimen as soon as possible, thereby improving patients' quality of life (QoL). Conclusions Low-cost transpedicular corpectomy via minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a safe and effective method that meets the goals of separation surgery. However, prospective studies are needed to directly compare open techniques with minimally invasive methods.

Indexed as

corpectomymetastatic spinal cord compressionminimally invasive surgeryspinal metastasestranspedicular corpectomy

Identifiers

PMID39479069
PMCPMC11523553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.