SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
Effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Evidence Certainty of High-Frequency rTMS for Cognitive Impairment Across Neuropsychiatric Disorders: An Umbrella Review.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Noninvasive brain stimulation for upper limb motor activity in children and young adults with cerebral palsy and pediatric stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of 5-Hz Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Improving Cognitive Function During the Recovery Phase of Stroke.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Review
- Protocol for a randomized controlled trial: efficacy and mechanisms of dual-target anodal tDCS in post-stroke cognitive impairment.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Domain-specific cognitive screening in acute first-ever stroke: a comparative study of the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) and ACE-III.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have suggested that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may be an effective and safe alternative treatment for post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). Similarly, the application of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during stroke rehabilitation has been shown to improve cognitive function in PSCI patients. However, there have been conflicting results from some studies. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of tDCS and rTMS on PSCI. Methods: The meta-analysis search for articles published from the initial availability date to 5 February 2024 in databases. The extracted study data were entered into STATA 12.0 software for statistical analysis. Results: This meta-analysis provides evidence that both rTMS and tDCS have a positive impact on general cognitive function in PSCI patients [immediate effect of rTMS: standard mean difference (SMD) = 2.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.44 to 3.71; long-term effect of rTMS: SMD = 2.33, 95% CI = 0.87-3.78; immediate effect of tDCS: SMD = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.31-3.12]. Specifically, rTMS was found to significantly improve attention, language, memory, and visuospatial functions, while it did not show a significant therapeutic effect on executive function (attention: SMD = 3.77, 95% CI = 2.30-5.24; executive function: SMD = -0.52, 95% CI = -3.17-2.12; language: SMD = 3.43, 95% CI = 1.50-5.36; memory: SMD = 3.52, 95% CI = 1.74-5.30; visuospatial function: SMD = 4.71, 95% CI = 2.61-6.80). On the other hand, tDCS was found to significantly improve executive and visuospatial functions but did not show a significant improvement in attention function and memory (attention: SMD = 0.63, 95% CI = -0.30-1.55; executive function: SMD = 2.15, 95% CI = 0.87-3.43; memory: SMD = 0.99, 95% CI = -0.81-2.80; visuospatial function: SMD = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.04-4.23). Conclusion: In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrates that both rTMS and tDCS are effective therapeutic techniques for improving cognitive function in PSCI. However, more large-scale studies are needed to further investigate the effects of these techniques on different cognitive domains in PSCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.