ArticleJTCVS techniques2024
Short-term outcomes of robotic left ventricular patch ventriculoplasty for significant mitral annular calcification.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Managing mitral annular calcification-high-end robotic mitral valve repair for experienced surgeons.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Robotic mitral valve repair in the setting of mitral annular calcification: the value of repair, the valor of judgment.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Totally endoscopic port access for rheumatic mitral valve replacement: Clinical outcomes and a single surgeon's learning curve experience.JTCVS techniques · 2026Article
- Tackling MAC and other complex mitral valve repair scenarios through the lens of robotics.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Precision hybrid technique for direct SAPIEN-3 ultra™ implantation in extensive mitral annular calcification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic posterior bar decalcification and mitral repair in mitral annular calcification.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Mitral annular calcification: implications on clinical outcomes and interventions.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Surgical management of mitral annular calcification remains challenging. Our institution pursued a strategy of total mitral annular calcification resection with pericardial patch reconstruction of the left ventricle when primary atrioventricular groove closure was not possible. We present the short-term outcomes derived after implementing this strategy. Methods: A single-institution retrospective analysis included patients with significant mitral annular calcification undergoing totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery between October 2009 and August 2023. Mitral valve repair was performed in patients with sufficient posterior leaflet length. Patients requiring pericardial patch ventriculoplasty were compared with those in whom primary atrioventricular groove closure was possible (non-pericardial patch ventriculoplasty). Results: Of 1441 patients who underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery, 217 (15.1%) presented with significant mitral annular calcification. Pericardial patch ventriculoplasty was performed in 69 patients (31.8%). Patients undergoing non-pericardial patch ventriculoplasty were significantly younger than patients undergoing pericardial patch ventriculoplasty (63.4 vs 67.8 years, Conclusions: Totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair is a safe and feasible technique for the management of mitral annular calcification with promising results at 3 years. Patients who required atrioventricular groove pericardial patch reconstruction had similar outcomes to those in whom primary closure was possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.