ArticleJTCVS techniques2024
A prospective study of a training program for bronchial sleeve resection using operable 3-dimensional models.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical simulation of minimally invasive bronchial sleeve resection and reconstruction using interactive 3-dimensional airway models.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted surgical simulation system based on non-enhanced computed tomography images in thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomies.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- A 3-dimensional model for bronchial and arterial sleeve resection.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a training program for bronchial sleeve reconstruction using our previously developed 3-dimensional (3D) operable airway model and evaluate its effectiveness in surgical trainees. Methods: Eight trainees and 4 faculty surgeons were enrolled. Their right upper lobe sleeve reconstruction procedures were scored by 2 senior surgeons in a blinded fashion on a 5-point Likert scale on the following: airway wall tear, reapplied ligatures, reapplied needles, needle entry and exit, anastomotic bite, and caliber adjustment (full score: 30). The trainees were randomized into training and control groups (n = 4 in each group). The training group underwent 6 cycles of training guided by video-based instructions. The control group underwent regular clinical training. All trainees were reevaluated. Results: Before training, the median score of faculty surgeons was better than that of trainees (27.0 [range, 21.0-28.0] vs 17.5 [range, 9.5, 26.5]; Conclusions: The training program for bronchial sleeve resection using 3D airway models with video-based instructions improved the trainees' skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.