Article in MycoKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Yu-Yu ShenKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4947-4266
Zi-Wen ZhangKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4045-8505
Wen-Qian LiKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1998-030X
Xing-Ning LiuKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0176-7943
Fei-Ying TianKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3212-5261
Chun-Mei PangManagement Bureau of Mount Tianmu National Nature Reserve, Hangzhou 311311, China Management Bureau of Mount Tianmu National Nature Reserve Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5346-8676
Wen-Hong DaiKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1238-3758
Yao-Bin SongKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-0423
Ming DongKey Laboratory of Hangzhou City for Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China Hangzhou Normal University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-2140
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Morpho-molecular analysis of two new species · full record | OpenQuestion