ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
MED-ChatGPT CoPilot: a ChatGPT medical assistant for case mining and adjunctive therapy.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Two AI Chatbots for Diagnosis and Providing Treatment Suggestions in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The information challenge in public health crises: a study on the reliability and readability of information provided by large language model for thunderstorm asthma.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The potential of DeepSeek for AI-aided diagnosis of antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis: a single-center, retrospective, observational study.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The large-scale language model, GPT-4-1106-preview, supports text of up to 128 k characters, which has enhanced the capability of processing vast quantities of text. This model can perform efficient and accurate text data mining without the need for retraining, aided by prompt engineering. Method: The research approach includes prompt engineering and text vectorization processing. In this study, prompt engineering is applied to assist ChatGPT in text mining. Subsequently, the mined results are vectorized and incorporated into a local knowledge base. After cleansing 306 medical papers, data extraction was performed using ChatGPT. Following a validation and filtering process, 241 medical case data entries were obtained, leading to the construction of a local medical knowledge base. Additionally, drawing upon the Langchain framework and utilizing the local knowledge base in conjunction with ChatGPT, we successfully developed a fast and reliable chatbot. This chatbot is capable of providing recommended diagnostic and treatment information for various diseases. Results: The performance of the designed ChatGPT model, which was enhanced by data from the local knowledge base, exceeded that of the original model by 7.90% on a set of medical questions. Conclusion: ChatGPT, assisted by prompt engineering, demonstrates effective data mining capabilities for large-scale medical texts. In the future, we plan to incorporate a richer array of medical case data, expand the scale of the knowledge base, and enhance ChatGPT's performance in the medical field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.