ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024
The Translational Science Benefits Model, a new training tool for demonstrating implementation science impact: A pilot study.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Road from Science to Health: The Importance of Designing For, Measuring, and Communicating Impact in Public Health.Annual review of public health · 2026Review
- Building capacity and equity in implementation science: evaluation of a national mentored training program.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- A mapping review and critique of the literature on translation, dissemination, and implementation capacity building initiatives for different audiences.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- Clinical and translational science award hub portfolio analysis and interorganizational collaborations with Los Angeles County to improve population health and health care delivery (ID 1565096).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Taking the Translational Science Benefits Model from concept to operationalization: opportunities and challenges in defining impact using the Translational Science Benefits Model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Leveraging the translational science benefits model to enhance planning and evaluation of impact in CTSA hub-supported research.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Measuring the aggregated impact of research: Establishing criteria for coding Translational Science Benefits Model data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Using the translational science benefits model to evaluate the impact of community-engaged programs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- An iterative approach to evaluating impact of CTSA projects using the translational science benefits model.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Examining rural health equity and impact through the translational science benefits model: outcomes from the CTSA Consortium of Rural States (CORES).Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Navigating the road ahead: using concept mapping to assess Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program goals.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The Translational Science Benefits Model, a new training tool for demonstrating implementation science impact: A pilot study - ADDENDUM.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Demonstrating the impact of implementation science presents a new frontier for the field, and operationalizing downstream impact is challenging. The Translational Science Benefits Model (TSBM) offers a new approach for assessing and demonstrating research impact. Here we describe integration of the TSBM into a mentored training network. Methods: Washington University's Clinical and Translational Science Awards TSBM team collaborated with a National Institute of Mental Health-supported training program, the Implementation Research Institute (IRI), a 2-year training institute in mental health implementation science. This partnership included three phases: (1) introductory workshop on research impact, (2) workshop on demonstrating impact, and (3) sessions to guide dissemination, including interactive tools and consultation with the TSBM research team. Fifteen IRI alumni were invited to participate in the pilot; six responded agreeing to participate in the training, develop TSBM case studies, and provide feedback about their experiences. Participants applied the tools and gave feedback on design, usability, and content. We present their case studies and describe how the IRI used the results to incorporate TSBM into future trainings. Results: The case studies identified 40 benefits spanning all four TSBM domains, including 21 community, 11 policy, five economic, and three clinical benefits. Participants reported that TSBM training helped them develop a framework for talking about impact. Selecting benefits was challenging for early-stage projects, suggesting the importance of early training. Conclusions: The case studies showcased the institute's impact and the fellows' work and informed refinement of tools and methods for incorporating TSBM into future IRI training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.