Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478759›Full record

ArticleMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention2024

Estimation and Analysis of Slice Propagation Uncertainty in 3D Anatomy Segmentation.

Rachaell Nihalaani, Tushar Kataria, Jadie Adams, Shireen Y Elhabian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachaell NihalaaniKahlert School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Tushar KatariaKahlert School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Jadie AdamsKahlert School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Shireen Y ElhabianKahlert School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

Funding

ShapeWorks in the CloudR01AR076120 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELHABIAN, SHIREEN YOUSSEF · 2019 to 2024
$2.7M
ShapeWorksStudio: An Integrative, User-Friendly, and Scalable Suite for Shape Representation and AnalysisU24EB029011 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELHABIAN, SHIREEN YOUSSEF · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR076120NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supervised methods for 3D anatomy segmentation demonstrate superior performance but are often limited by the availability of annotated data. This limitation has led to a growing interest in self-supervised approaches in tandem with the abundance of available unannotated data. Slice propagation has emerged as a self-supervised approach that leverages slice registration as a self-supervised task to achieve full anatomy segmentation with minimal supervision. This approach significantly reduces the need for domain expertise, time, and the cost associated with building fully annotated datasets required for training segmentation networks. However, this shift toward reduced supervision via deterministic networks raises concerns about the trustworthiness and reliability of predictions, especially when compared with more accurate supervised approaches. To address this concern, we propose integrating calibrated uncertainty quantification (UQ) into slice propagation methods, which would provide insights into the model's predictive reliability and confidence levels. Incorporating uncertainty measures enhances user confidence in self-supervised approaches, thereby improving their practical applicability. We conducted experiments on three datasets for 3D abdominal segmentation using five UQ methods. The results illustrate that incorporating UQ improves not only model trustworthiness but also segmentation accuracy. Furthermore, our analysis reveals various failure modes of slice propagation methods that might not be immediately apparent to end-users. This study opens up new research avenues to improve the accuracy and trustworthiness of slice propagation methods.

Indexed as

3D Volume SegmentationBenchmarkingEpistemic UncertaintySlice PropagationUncertainty Quantification

Identifiers

PMID39478759
PMCPMC11520486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.