Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478620›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2024

Improving postoperative survival in cholangiocarcinoma: development of surgical strategies with a screening program in the epidemic region.

Vasin Thanasukarn, Tharatip Srisuk, Vor Luvira, Theerawee Tipwaratorn, Apiwat Jareanrat, Krit Rattanarak, Khanisara Kraphunpongsakul, Natcha Khuntikeo, Jarin Chindaprasirt, Thanachai Sanlung and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Vasin ThanasukarnDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Tharatip SrisukDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Vor LuviraDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Theerawee TipwaratornDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Apiwat JareanratDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Krit RattanarakDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Khanisara KraphunpongsakulDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Natcha KhuntikeoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Jarin ChindaprasirtMedical oncology unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Thanachai SanlungMedical oncology unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Nittaya ChamadolDepartments of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Supinda KoonmeeDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Prakasit Sa-NgiamwiboolDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Poramate KlanritSystems Biosciences and Computational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Arporn WangwiwatsinSystems Biosciences and Computational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Nisana NamwatSystems Biosciences and Computational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Watcharin LoilomeSystems Biosciences and Computational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Nattha MuangritdechCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Piya PrajumwongsCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Nobuyuki WatanabeDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Tomoki EbataDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Attapol TitapunDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. attati@kku.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP) has been launched since 2013 to detect early-stage cholangiocarcinoma and reduce the disease death. However, the clinical utility of the CASCAP remains unclear. To compare survival outcomes between two time periods: before and after 2013, when significant changes in treatment strategies were implemented, and to evaluate the efficacy of the ultrasound-based screening program, in an Asian region endemic for cholangiocarcinoma.

methodsA single-center retrospective review was conducted in curative-intended resection cholangiocarcinoma from 2002 to 2021. Patents characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between 2002 and 2013 (early period) and 2014 to 2021 (later period).

resultsA total of 1091 patients with intrahepatic (n = 624) or perihilar (n = 467) cholangiocarcinoma was included (early period, n = 658; later period, n = 433). Of 66 (15.2%) patients in the later period were referred by the CASCAP. The incidence of early-staged disease (Stage 0 and 1) was lower in early period compared to later period 16.0% versus 29.1% (p < 0.001); that of positive surgical margin was higher in early period 53.7% versus 40.0% (p < 0.001). A median survival time (MST) was 14 months in early and 40 months in later period (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by tumor location, the MST was 13 versus 60 months in early and late periods for intrahepatic tumor (p < 0.001), respectively. While MST in perihilar tumor was 18 versus 31 months in early and late periods(p < 0.001), respectively. By presentation, the MST was 51 vs. 38 months, respectively, with screening and usual presentation (p = 0.06).

conclusionPostoperative survival in CCA patients improved more than doubled during the study period. Moreover, the late period demonstrated enhanced early-stage detection, a higher rate of negative surgical margins, and improved survival outcomes.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaEarly Detection of CancerAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateCholangiocarcinomaCholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care ProgramScreening programSurgical strategiesSurvival outcome

Identifiers

PMID39478620
PMCPMC11526638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.