ArticleHead & face medicine2024
Proximal tibia for alveolar augmentation and augmentative rhinoplasty-a suitable option? A retrospective clinical study on donor and recipient site morbidity.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes and complications of autologous versus alloplastic grafts in augmentation rhinoplasty: A systematic review of studies from 2000 to 2024.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Towards Sustainable Bone Grafting: Life Cycle Assessment of Donor Cadaver-Derived Allograft (BMG) Production Using a BMP-Preserving Approach.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutologous bone grafts are essential in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery, and depending on the donor site, they can be associated with specific harvesting morbidities. One of the most commonly applied bone grafts is the iliac crest bone graft, irrespective of other grafts, which might be associated with an easier surgical procedure or the possibility of harvesting them under local anaesthesia. Objective of the study is the clinical evaluation of proximal tibia bone grafts regarding their eligibility for maxillofacial bone grafting.
methodsIn this retrospective study, proximal tibia bone grafts were examined with regard to associated donor and recipient site morbidity and their suitability for alveolar ridge augmentation and rhinoplasty.
resultsIn total, 21 tibia grafts were included. Fifty-seven percent of the bone grafts were used for alveolar ridge reconstruction, and 43% were used for augmentative rhinoplasty. No significant complications occurred during or after harvesting, but in 14.3% of the patients, minor wound healing disorders were recorded at the donor site, and in 19% of the patients, they were recorded at the recipient site. Statistically, patient sex, age, nicotine and alcohol abuse and metabolic diseases had no significant influence on the complication rate. Graft harvesting under local anaesthesia and at summer temperatures was associated with significantly more complications at the harvesting site (p < 0.05). In cases of dental implant insertion into augmented sites, the implants (n = 31) were followed up for a median period of 40.5 months, during this time 86.7% of the implants survived.
conclusionThe proximal tibia is a suitable donor site for harvesting autologous bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation or rhinoplasty because the donor site morbidity is low, and in contrast to iliac crest bone grafts, they can be harvested under local anaesthesia, which might be advantageous for outpatient surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.