ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
A comparative study of the effect of facet tropism on the index-level kinematics and biomechanics after artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) with Prestige LP, Prodisc-C vivo, and Mobi-C: a finite element study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionArtificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) is a widely accepted surgical procedure in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. However, some research suggests that ACDR may redistribute more load onto the facet joints, potentially leading to postoperative axial pain in certain patients. Earlier studies have indicated that facet tropism is prevalent in the lower cervical spine and can significantly increase facet joint pressure. The present study aims to investigate the changes in the biomechanical environment of the cervical spine after ACDR using different prosthese when facet tropism is present.
methodsA C2-C7 cervical spine finite element model was created. Symmetrical, moderate asymmetrical (7 degrees tropism), and severe asymmetrical (14 degrees tropism) models were created at the C5/C6 level by adjusting the left-side facet. C5/C6 ACDR with Prestige LP, Prodisc-C vivo, and Mobi-C were simulated in all models. A 75 N follower load and 1 N⋅m moment was applied to initiate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, and the range of motions (ROMs), facet contact forces(FCFs), and facet capsule stress were recorded.
resultsIn the presence of facet tropism, all ACDR models exhibited significantly higher FCFs and facet capsule stress compared to the intact model. In the asymmetric model, FCFs on the right side were significantly increased in neutral position, extension, left bending and right rotation, and on both sides in right bending and left rotation compared to the symmetric model. All ACDR model in the presence of facet tropism, exhibited significantly higher facet capsule stresses at all positions compared to the symmetric model. The stress distribution on the facet surface and the capsule ligament in the asymmetrical models was different from that in the symmetrical model.
conclusionsThe existence of facet tropism could considerably increase FCFs and facet capsule stress after ACDR with Prestige-LP, Prodisc-C Vivo, and Mobi-C. None of the three different designs of implants were able to effectively protect the facet joints in the presence of facet tropism. Research into designing new implants may be needed to improve this situation. Clinical trials are needed to validate the impact of facet tropism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.