ArticleBMC nursing2024
Influencing factors of work engagement among ophthalmic specialized nurses in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived organizational support as a mediator between role clarity and work engagement among neurology specialist nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Impact of sleep quality on work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses: a structural equation model integrating psychosocial factors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Technophobia and Its Associated Factors Among Registered Nurses in China: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Work engagement and associated factors among Chinese nurses: a multi-centre cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aims to investigate the current status of work engagement among ophthalmic specialized nurses in China and explore the multifaceted factors influencing work engagement from the physical, psychological, and social perspectives.
methodsThis study adopts a cross-sectional survey design, distributed electronic questionnaires through WeChat software, and 261 valid questionnaires were received from ophthalmic specialized nurses. The survey includes demographic information about ophthalmic specialized nurses, as well as work engagement, sleep quality and social support. A generalized linear model was used to investigate the factors influencing the work engagement of ophthalmic specialized nurses.
resultsThe overall work engagement score among ophthalmic specialized nurses in our study was 143.70 ± 13.66. Multivariate analysis showed that participation in teaching, professional title, sleep quality and perceived social support were the influencing factors of work engagement of ophthalmic specialized nurses. DISCUSSION: The results showed that ophthalmic specialized nurses with the title of "senior nurse", participating in teaching had higher work engagement. According to the Two-Factor Theory, incentive factors can stimulate the work enthusiasm of specialized nurses. The worse the sleep quality of ophthalmic specialized nurses, the lower the work engagement. It is suggested that nursing managers should pay attention to the sleep problems of specialized nurses and reduce work burnout. The nurses who perceived higher levels of social support exhibited higher work engagement. Because social support can mitigate nurses' work burnout and work-related stress.
conclusionOphthalmic specialized nurses in China demonstrate a relatively high level of work engagement. Those with the title of senior nurse, involvement in teaching, better sleep quality, and higher perceived social support exhibit higher work engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.