Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478525›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

The diagnosis value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) multi-parameter imaging in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

Xingxing Zheng, Hongzhe Tian, Wei Li, Jun Li, Kai Xu, Chenwang Jin, Yuhui Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xingxing ZhengDepartment of Medical Imaging, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, China.
Hongzhe TianDepartment of Medical Imaging, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, China.
Wei LiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Pathology, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, China.
Kai XuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, China.
Chenwang JinDepartment of Medical Imaging, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. jinchenwang202406@163.com.
Yuhui PangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji, China. pangyuhui1994@163.com.

Funding

Baoji Health Committee Foundation of China Grant Number 2019-01Baoji Health Committee Foundation of China Grant Number 2021-023Baoji Health Committee Foundation of China Grant Number 2024-035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer continues to pose a serious risk to human health. With a high mortality rate, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the major type of lung cancer, making up to 85% of all cases of lung cancer. Lung adenocarcinoma (AC), and lung squamous cell carcinoma (SC) are the two primary types of NSCLC. Determining the pathological type of NSCLC is important in establishing the most effective treatment method. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) multi-parameter imaging is an imaging technology that provides accurate and reliable disease diagnosis, and its uses are utilized for the combined diagnostic efficacy of AC and SC. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of spectral parameters of DECT in efficacy to AC and SC, and their combined diagnostic efficacy was also analyzed.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging data for 36 patients diagnosed with SC and 35 patients with AC. These patients underwent preoperative DECT chest scans, encompassing both arterial and venous phases, at our hospital from December 2020 to April 2022. The tumor diameter, water concentration (WC), iodine concentration (IC), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), Z effective (Zeff), and slope of the curve (K) in lesions were evaluated during two scanning phases in the two separate pathological types of lung cancers. The differences in parameters between these two types of lung cancers were statistically analyzed. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed for these parameters to distinguish between SC and AC.

resultsIn a univariate analysis involving 71 lung cancer patients, the results from Zeff, IC, NIC, and K from the AC's arterial and venous phase images were more elevated than those from the SC (P < 0.05). In contrast, the WC results were lower than those from SC (P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for multi-parameter joint prediction typing was 0.831, with a corresponding sensitivity of 63.9% and specificity of 94.3%.

conclusionIt is possible to distinguish between central SC and AC using the spectrum characteristics of DECT-enhanced scanning (Zeff, IC, NIC, K, WC, and tumor diameter). Diagnostic effectiveness can be greatly improved when multiple variables are included.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityEnergy spectrum CTLung adenocarcinomaLung squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39478525
PMCPMC11526545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.