Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478504›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Timely empirical antibiotic therapy against sepsis in a rural Norwegian ambulance service: a prospective cohort study.

Lars-Jøran Andersson, Gunnar Skov Simonsen, Erik Solligård, Knut Fredriksen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Yonder: Prescribing and deprivation, delayed antibiotic prescriptions, pre-hospital antibiotics in sepsis, and differential attainment.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lars-Jøran AnderssonAnaesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. lan073@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4778-3156
Gunnar Skov SimonsenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0043-7045
Erik SolligårdDepartment of Research, Innovation, Education and Health Service Development, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6173-3580
Knut FredriksenAnaesthesia and Critical Care Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-8007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis and antibiotic therapy in patients with sepsis reduce morbidity and mortality, thus pre-hospital management is likely to affect patient outcomes. Pre-hospital administration may increase the risk of unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, but identification of an infectious focus enables more targeted antibiotic therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate how paramedics, with or without the assistance of general practitioners, can administer empiric intravenous antibiotic treatment against sepsis in a timely manner.

methodsCohort study of patients with suspected sepsis that received pre-hospital intravenous antibiotics and were transported to hospital. The setting was mainly rural with long average distance to hospital. Patients received targeted antibiotic treatment after an assessment based on clinical work-up supported by scoring systems. Patients were prospectively included from May 2018 to August 2022. Results are presented as median or absolute values, and chi-square tests were used to compare categorical data.

resultsWe included 328 patients. Median age was 76 years (IQR 64, 83) and 48.5% of patients were female. 30-days all-cause mortality was 10.4%. In cases where a suspected infectious focus was determined, the hospital discharge papers confirmed the pre-hospital diagnosis focus in 195 cases (79.3%). The presence of a general practitioner during the pre-hospital assessment increased the rate of correctly identified infectious focus from 72.6% to 86.1% (p = 0.009). Concordance between pre-hospital identification of a tentative focus and discharge diagnosis was highest for lower respiratory tract (p = 0.02) and urinary tract infections (p = 0.03). Antibiotic treatment was initiated 44 min (median) after arrival of ambulance, and median transportation time to hospital was 69 min. Antibiotic therapy was started 76 min (median) before arrival at hospital.

conclusionsPre-hospital identification of infectious focus in suspected sepsis was feasible, and collaboration with primary care physicians increased level of diagnostic accuracy. This allowed initiation of intravenous focus-directed antibiotics more than one hour before arrival in hospital in a rural setting. The effect of pre-hospital therapy on timing was much stronger than in previous studies from more urban areas.

Indexed as

AmbulancesAnti-Bacterial AgentsSepsisAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProspective StudiesTime-to-TreatmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsAmbulanceAnti-Bacterial AgentsEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Medical TechniciansGeneral practitionersParamedicsPrimary Care PhysiciansSepsis

Identifiers

PMID39478504
PMCPMC11526532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.