Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478472›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

Instruments for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: a scoping review.

Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-Grande, Mayra Liseth Díaz Galvis, Paula Catalina Medina Prieto, Olga-Cecilia Vargas-Pinilla, Martha-Rocío Torres-Narváez, Nelcy Rodríguez Malagón

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eliana-Isabel Rodríguez-GrandeSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Group Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 # 63C - 74 -, Bogotá, Colombia. eliana.rodriguez@urosario.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5051-8447
Mayra Liseth Díaz GalvisSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Group Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 # 63C - 74 -, Bogotá, Colombia.
Paula Catalina Medina PrietoSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Group Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 # 63C - 74 -, Bogotá, Colombia.
Olga-Cecilia Vargas-PinillaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Group Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 # 63C - 74 -, Bogotá, Colombia.
Martha-Rocío Torres-NarváezSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Research Group Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Carrera 24 # 63C - 74 -, Bogotá, Colombia.
Nelcy Rodríguez MalagónDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Doctoral program in Clinical Epidemiology, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construct of quality of life (QoL) includes aspects of health and well-being of people. Down syndrome [DS] or trisomy 21 is one of the most common congenital anomalies. DS is characterized by motor and cognitive alterations that affect health and QOL of both the child and caregiver.In pediatrics, there are various instruments to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and QoL. The advantage of these instruments is that they can be implemented in any type of disease and population in general. However, they may have certain disadvantages, such as the difficulty in evaluating specific aspects of each disease or condition related to Down syndrome. The aim of this study was to identify 1: instruments used to assess quality of life in children with Down syndrome. 2: psychometrics properties of instruments validated in children with Down syndrome to assess quality of life. Methods A Scoping review was conducted to identify instruments used in children and adolescents with Down syndrome, and a second systematic searched psychometric properties of these instruments. The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Epistemonikos and other sources were explored with a search strategy that included keywords such as "Down syndrome," "Quality of life" or "Life Quality," "Health-Related Quality of Life" and psychometrics properties. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the COSMIN (Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments) methodology. Results Twenty-seven studies were selected that used twelve instruments to evaluate quality of life in children or adolescents with Down syndrome. Two of the twelve evaluated quality of life and ten health-related quality of life. In the second search, ten studies reported the psychometric properties of six instruments evaluated in minors with Down Syndrome. Conclusion There is limited information available regarding the psychometric properties of instruments used to assess quality of life, particularly health-related quality of life. Commonly employed instruments in this area include the PedsQL 4.0 and KIDSCREEN. Notably, while the PedsQL 4.0 lacks specific evaluation in children with DS, data from KIDSCREEN assessments are inconsistently reported. Rigorous evaluation of the performance of Kidslife and Kidslife Down in clinical settings is necessary, or the development of new instruments tailored for children with DS is warranted to comprehensively assess quality of life in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Down SyndromePsychometricsQuality of LifeAdolescentChildHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentsChildrenDown syndromeHealth-related quality of lifePsychometric propertiesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID39478472
PMCPMC11523826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.