ArticleBMC immunology2024
Warning values of serum total kappa/lambda ratio for M-proteinemia.
Article in BMC immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo introduce the serum total kappa/lambda ratio (K/L) in humoral immunity testing reports to improve the detection rate of M-proteinemia.
methods156 M protein-positive and 5464 M protein-negative samples confirmed by serum immunofixation electrophoresis(sIFE) were accumulated from January 2021 to December 2023 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and the contents of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgM, kappa and lambda) were tested by Beckman IMMAGE800. All the samples were divided into two groups by time: the modeling group and the validation group. The K/L values in the modeling group were analyzed by SPSS 27.0 to get the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Furthermore, a more in-depth analysis was conducted to verify the reliability of the optimal cutoff values in the validation group. In addition, the levels of immunoglobulins of another group including 106 patients with definite diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy ranging from January 2021 to June 2024 were traced back to improve the diagnostic efficiency.
resultsThe optimal cutoff values of K/L were 2.31 and 1.43 corresponding to K-type and L-type M-proteinemia respectively by ROC analysis. The sensitivity and specificity were validated as 76.14% and 77.42%. False positives were mainly found in samples with systemic sclerosis (36.84%), hypohepatia (28.71%) and sicca syndrome (27.27%). While false negatives were mainly found in IgA monoclonal gammopathy (38.39%) and IgM monoclonal gammopathy (28.57%). Combining with the detection rules of IgG, IgA and IgM, the sensitivities for the diagnosis of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis(AL) and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance(MGUS) can be increased to 83.33% and 85%.
conclusionsK/L > 2.31 and K/L < 1.43 can be used as warning values for M-proteinemia. In addition, the content of the heavy chain in IgA- or IgM-type M-proteinemia may be considered to improve the detection rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.