Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478454›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

BASE: a web service for providing compound-protein binding affinity prediction datasets with reduced similarity bias.

Hyojin Son, Sechan Lee, Jaeuk Kim, Haangik Park, Myeong-Ha Hwang, Gwan-Su Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyojin SonDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sechan LeeDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jaeuk KimDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Haangik ParkDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Myeong-Ha HwangDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Gwan-Su YiDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea. gwansuyi@kaist.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning-based drug-target affinity (DTA) prediction methods have shown impressive performance, despite a high number of training parameters relative to the available data. Previous studies have highlighted the presence of dataset bias by suggesting that models trained solely on protein or ligand structures may perform similarly to those trained on complex structures. However, these studies did not propose solutions and focused solely on analyzing complex structure-based models. Even when ligands are excluded, protein-only models trained on complex structures still incorporate some ligand information at the binding sites. Therefore, it is unclear whether binding affinity can be accurately predicted using only compound or protein features due to potential dataset bias. In this study, we expanded our analysis to comprehensive databases and investigated dataset bias through compound and protein feature-based methods using multilayer perceptron models. We assessed the impact of this bias on current prediction models and proposed the binding affinity similarity explorer (BASE) web service, which provides bias-reduced datasets.

resultsBy analyzing eight binding affinity databases using multilayer perceptron models, we confirmed a bias where the compound-protein binding affinity can be accurately predicted using compound features alone. This bias arises because most compounds show consistent binding affinities due to high sequence or functional similarity among their target proteins. Our Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection analysis based on compound fingerprints further revealed that low and high variation compounds do not exhibit significant structural differences. This suggests that the primary factor driving the consistent binding affinities is protein similarity rather than compound structure. We addressed this bias by creating datasets with progressively reduced protein similarity between the training and test sets, observing significant changes in model performance. We developed the BASE web service to allow researchers to download and utilize these datasets. Feature importance analysis revealed that previous models heavily relied on protein features. However, using bias-reduced datasets increased the importance of compound and interaction features, enabling a more balanced extraction of key features.

conclusionsWe propose the BASE web service, providing both the affinity prediction results of existing models and bias-reduced datasets. These resources contribute to the development of generalized and robust predictive models, enhancing the accuracy and reliability of DTA predictions in the drug discovery process. BASE is freely available online at https://synbi2024.kaist.ac.kr/base .

Indexed as

Protein BindingProteinsBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningInternetLigandsSoftwareLigandsProteinsDataset biasDeep learningDrug discoveryDrug-target affinity predictionProtein similarity

Identifiers

PMID39478454
PMCPMC11526688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.