Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478442›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Horticultural therapy impact on people with dementia.

Adi Vitman-Schorr, Moran Chen, Ayelet Naveh, Tamar Hirshenzon Peiper, Orly Ganany Dagan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adi Vitman-SchorrSocial Work Department and The Research Centre for Innovation in Social Work, Tel Hai College, Qiryat Shemona, Israel. adivitman@gmail.com.
Moran ChenOranim College, kiryat Tiv'on, Israel.
Ayelet NavehThe Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tamar Hirshenzon PeiperElah Ceter for Coping with Loss, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Orly Ganany DaganTel Hai College, Qiryat Shemona, Israel.

Funding

CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia is a progressive disease, and as the disease progresses, many families seek help through activities and therapies. In contrast to some other therapies, horticultural therapy (HT) is widely accepted by most people with dementia (PWD) because it invites them to the natural world.

objectivesTo explore whether HT emotional and communication measures (i.e. appropriate expression of emotions, ability to communicate with others) are higher than in other activities offered to PWD in adult day care centers (ADCC) and continuing care retirement community (CCRC), and whether there is a difference between the impact of HT on the number of "positive actions" (communication actions and actions that fit the guided activity) vs. the other activities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsFifty-one PWD attending ADCCs and living in one CCRC were recruited to a structured HT activity and other activities that took place in the ADCCs and CCRC. The activity took place over 10 weeks. The effects were assessed using Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) and questionnaires.

resultsPaired t-tests found that higher levels of mood and behavior were observed during HT activities compared to the other activities. Also, communication and function actions were higher in the HT activities as compared to the other activities. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: This study adds to the growing evidence of the benefits of HT for PWD regardless of past experience in gardening/agriculture. HT seems to provide high therapeutic benefits and should be more prevalent in centers caring for PWD.

Indexed as

DementiaHorticultural TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleDementiaDementia care mappingHorticultural therapyIntervention program

Identifiers

PMID39478442
PMCPMC11523874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.