SynthesisHistopathology2025
Fat embolism: a systematic review to facilitate the development of standardised procedures in pathology.
Synthesis in Histopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Non-Traumatic Fat Embolism Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease Complicated by Bone Marrow Necrosis Successfully Treated with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: A Case Report.Journal of blood medicine · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Fat Embolism After Fat Grafting.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fat embolism syndrome in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an underdiagnosed complication.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2025Article
- Non-thrombotic pulmonary emboli: imaging findings and differential diagnoses.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Deterioration and Manifestation of Cerebral Fat Embolism Triggered by Bone Reaming During Femur Fracture Surgery: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsy in orthopedic trauma: exosomes as functional mediators and mechanistic indicators in post-traumatic complications.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and prognostic insights of cerebral fat embolism: a literature review.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fat embolism (FE) is a historically recognised but still actively researched topic in forensic pathology. Several aspects remain not fully elucidated, such as its aetiopathogenesis, its causal role in death determination, the impact of interfering factors (e.g. cardiopulmonary resuscitation or other medical procedures) and both qualitative and quantitative diagnostic methodologies in clinical and forensic contexts. These issues are further underscored by the potential involvement of FE in the causal determination of non-traumatic deaths, which often raises questions of professional liability. The present study aims to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the most recent scientific evidence relevant to forensic pathology. Our systematic research has included 58 articles from 1990 to the present on the topic of FE and fat embolism syndrome (FES). From these articles, we identified 45 case reports, from which the authors' descriptions were extracted to provide information on individual cases and the operational methods of forensic pathologists. Additionally, 21 experimental studies were identified, and their key findings have been summarised narratively. It has emerged that both traumatic and non-traumatic cases are frequently reported in the forensic context, with orthopaedic and cosmetic surgery being among the highest-risk specialities. Experimental studies have re-evaluated the role of a patent foramen ovale in the pathogenesis of FE, as well as the impact of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in causing FE severe enough to result in death. Additionally, there are new findings regarding diagnostic techniques, including radiological and immunohistological methods; however, they have not yet fully bridged the reliability gap compared to an accurate autopsy-histological evaluation. The major critical points that emerged include the lack of complete and detailed information on premortem clinical conditions, the underutilisation of grading systems and the methodological heterogeneity applied, resulting in considerable variability regarding the organs studied histologically and the diagnostic techniques used. Despite the limitations associated with the analysis of case reports and the heterogeneity of included experimental studies, we believe that this study can provide a comprehensive overview of the FE topic. It furnishes pathologists with an updated overview useful for clinical practice and guiding future research trends, as well as facilitating the development of standardised procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.