Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39478084›Full record

ReviewNature microbiology2024

Community standards and future opportunities for synthetic communities in plant-microbiota research.

Trent R Northen, Manuel Kleiner, Marta Torres, Ákos T Kovács, Mette Haubjerg Nicolaisen, Dorota M Krzyżanowska, Shilpi Sharma, George Lund, Lars Jelsbak, Oliver Baars and 12 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unlocking the power ofmSystems · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Artificial soil (ArtSoil): Recreating soil conditions in synthetic plant growth media.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Microbial biotechnology meets ecological theory: a unified framework to design industrial microbial consortia.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Trent R NorthenEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. TRNorthen@lbl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8404-3259
Manuel KleinerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6904-0287
Marta TorresEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0609-9123
Ákos T KovácsInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4465-1636
Mette Haubjerg NicolaisenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dorota M KrzyżanowskaIntercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology UG&MUG, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0177-377X
Shilpi SharmaDepartment of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
George LundSustainable Soils and Crops, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-3461
Lars JelsbakDTU Bioengineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5759-9769
Oliver BaarsDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Nikolaj Lunding KindtlerTerrestrial Ecology Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kathrin WippelSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caja DinesenInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jessica A FerrareziDepartment of Genetics, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3804-6982
Malek MarianCenter for Agriculture Food Environment, University of Trento, San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-2732
Adele PioppiInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Xinming XuInstitute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-4526
Tonni AndersenMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.
Niko GeldnerDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Paul Schulze-LefertMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8978-1717
Julia A VorholtInstitute of Microbiology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6011-4910
Ruben Garrido-OterMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Cologne, Germany. garridoo@mpipz.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-892X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) DECRyPT, SPP2125Novo Nordisk Fonden (Novo Nordisk Foundation) NNF19SA0059360RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/X010953/1; BBS/E/RH/230003BTata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) TATA Transformation prize in Food Security
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Harnessing beneficial microorganisms is seen as a promising approach to enhance sustainable agriculture production. Synthetic communities (SynComs) are increasingly being used to study relevant microbial activities and interactions with the plant host. Yet, the lack of community standards limits the efficiency and progress in this important area of research. To address this gap, we recommend three actions: (1) defining reference SynComs; (2) establishing community standards, protocols and benchmark data for constructing and using SynComs; and (3) creating an infrastructure for sharing strains and data. We also outline opportunities to develop SynCom research through technical advances, linking to field studies, and filling taxonomic blind spots to move towards fully representative SynComs.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPlantsAgricultureBacteriaSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.