ArticleScientific reports2024
Synergistic effects of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells/neural stem cells and epidural electrical stimulation on spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrical stimulation and stem cell subdural implantation decrease microglia reactivity after spinal cord injury.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Current status and future prospects of functionalized mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of spinal cord injury.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Organoid Brain-Machine-Interface Devices for Central Nervous System Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- The Interplay Between Neuromodulation and Stem Cell Therapy for Sensory-Motor Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Perspective View.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging strategies for spinal cord injury repair: stem cells, extracellular vesicles, biomaterials, and neuromodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Clinical Insights into Mesenchymal Stem Cell Applications for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Clinical Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy in Neurotraumatic and Neurodegenerative Conditions: A Comparative Review.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025Review
- Precision Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury: Integrating CRISPR Technologies, AI-Driven Therapeutics, Single-Cell Omics, and System Neuroregeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells and mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: a promising strategy for treating retinal degenerative diseases.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe neurological condition marked by a complex pathology leading to irreversible functional loss, which current treatments fail to improve. Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) shows promise in alleviating pathological pain, regulating hemodynamic disturbances, and enhancing motor function by modulating residual interneurons in the lower spinal cord. Cell transplantation (CT), especially using human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs) and neural stem cells (NSCs), has significantly improved sensory and motor recovery in SCI. However, the limitations of single treatments have driven the exploration of a multifaceted strategy, combining various modalities to optimize recovery at different stages. To comprehensively investigate the effectiveness of in situ transplantation of hUCMSCs/NSCs combined with subacute epidural electrical stimulation in a murine spinal cord crush injury model, providing valuable references for future animal studies and clinical research. In this study, we first examined neural stem cell changes via mRNA sequencing in an in vitro Transwell co-culture model. We then explored cell interaction mechanisms using proliferation assays, differentiation assays, and neuron complexity analysis. For animal experiments, 40 C57BL/6 mice were assigned to four groups (Injury/EES/CT/Combination). Histological evaluations employed HE and immunofluorescence staining, while electrophysiological and behavioral tests assessed motor recovery. Quantitative data were reported as mean ± standard error, with statistical analyses performed using GraphPad Prism and SPSS. Initially, we found that NSCs in the in vitro co-culture model showed a unique expression profile of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) compared to controls. GO/KEGG analysis indicated these DEGs were mainly linked to cell differentiation and growth factor secretion pathways. Neuronal and astrocytic markers further confirmed enhanced NSC differentiation and neuronal maturation in the co-culture model. In vivo, live imaging and human nuclei immunofluorescence staining revealed that transplanted cells persisted for some time post-transplantation. Histological analysis showed that during acute inflammation, both the stem cell and combined therapy groups significantly inhibited microglial polarization. In the chronic phase, these groups reduced fibrotic scar formation and encouraged astrocytic bridging. Behavioral tests, including swimming and gait analysis, demonstrated that combined CT and EES therapy was more effective than either treatment alone. In summary, the combined therapy offers a promising approach for spinal cord injury treatment, providing superior outcomes over individual treatments. Our findings underscore the potential of a combined treatment approach utilizing stem cells transplantation and EES as an effective strategy for the comprehensive management of spinal cord crush injury in mice. This integrated approach holds promise for enhancing functional recovery and improving the quality of life for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.