ArticleSchizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
Assessing the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia.
Article in Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence and psychosocial functioning in psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- The Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TSC) in Community Mental Health: Evaluating Self-Reported Psychiatric Disorders as a Predictor of Symptoms and Treatment Outcome.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Shared genetic architecture between Parkinson's disease and self-reported sleep-related traits implicates theSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetics to Improve Outcomes in Schizophrenia (GENios): A within-case molecular genetic study protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- Association between genetic liability to physical health conditions and comorbidities in individuals with severe mental illness: an analysis of two cross-sectional observational studies in the UK.The lancet. Psychiatry · 2025Observational
- Reliability and validity of the Brief Attention and Mood Scale of 7 Items: a self-administered, online assessment.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Undercounts of people with serious mental illness using the Washington Group Short Set questions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- AI for Analyzing Mental Health Disorders Among Social Media Users: Quarter-Century Narrative Review of Progress and Challenges.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing availability of biobanks is changing the way individuals are identified for genomic research. This study assesses the validity of a self-reported clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia. The study included 1744 clinically-ascertained participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder depressed-type (SA-D) diagnosed by self-report and/or research interview and 1453 UK Biobank participants with self-reported and/or medical record diagnosis of schizophrenia or SA-D. Unaffected controls included a total of 501,837 participants. We assessed the positive predictive values (PPV) of self-reported clinical diagnoses against research interview and medical record diagnoses. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) and phenotypes relating to demographics, education and employment were compared across diagnostic groups. The variance explained (r
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.