ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of physiological state and environmental stress on bacterial load estimation methodologies for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insights into the Role of Rifampicin Exposure and Clinical Baseline Covariates on the Response to Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When processed in solid or liquid medium, tuberculosis patient samples yield different proportions of a heterogenous bacterial community over the duration of treatment. We aimed to derive a relationship between methodologies for bacterial load determination and assess the effect of the growth phase of the parent culture and its exposure to stress on the results. Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv was grown with and without antibiotic (isoniazid or rifampicin) and sampled on day 0, 3, 11 and 21 of growth in broth culture. The bacterial load was estimated by colony counts and the BD BACTEC MGIT system. Linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models were used to describe the relationship between time-to-positivity (TTP) and time-to-growth (TTG) versus colony forming units (CFU), and growth units (GU) versus incubation time in MGIT. For samples with the same CFU, antibiotic-treated and stationary phase cells had a shorter TTP than antibiotic-free controls and early-logarithmic phase cells, respectively. Similarly, stationary phase samples reached higher GUs and had shorter TTG than early-log phase ones. This suggests that there is a population of bacterial cells that can be differentially recovered in liquid medium, giving us insight into the physiological states of the original culture, aiding the interpretation of clinical trial outputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.