Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477969›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Image tampering detection based on RDS-YOLOv5 feature enhancement transformation.

Meilong Zhu, Mingda Li, Zhaohui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meilong ZhuChina Telecom Research Institute, Beijing, 102209, China. zhuml5@chinatelecom.cn.
Mingda LiChina Telecom Research Institute, Beijing, 102209, China.
Zhaohui WangChina Telecom Research Institute, Beijing, 102209, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malicious image tampering has gradually become another way to threaten social stability and personal safety. Timely detection and precise positioning can help reduce the occurrence of risks and improve the overall safety of society. Due to the limitations of highly targeted dataset training and low-level feature extraction efficiency, the generalization and actual performance of the recent tampered detection technology have not yet reached expectations. In this study, we propose a tampered image detection method based on RDS-YOLOv5 feature enhancement transformation. Firstly, a multi-channel feature enhancement fusion algorithm is proposed to enhance the tampering traces in tampered images. Then, an improved deep learning model named RDS-YOLOv5 is proposed for the recognition of tampered images, and a nonlinear loss metric of aspect ratio was introduced into the original SIOU loss function to better optimize the training process of the model. Finally, RDS-YOLOv5 is trained by combining the features of the original image and the enhancement image to improve the robustness of the detection model. A total of 6187 images containing three forms of tampering: splice, remove, and copy-move were used to comprehensively evaluate the proposed algorithm. In ablation test, compared with the original YOLOv5 model, RDS-YOLOv5 achieved a performance improvement of 6.46%, 5.13%, and 3.15% on F1-Score, mAP50 and mAP95, respectively. In comparative experiments, using SRIOU as the loss function significantly improved the model's ability to search for the real tampered regions by 2.54%. And the RDS-YOLOv5 model trained by the fusion dataset further improved the comprehensive detection performance by about 1%.

Indexed as

Feature enhancementImage fusionNonlinear loss metricTampered imageTampering detection

Identifiers

PMID39477969
PMCPMC11525581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.