Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477906›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2024

Ultrasound Evaluation of the Hip.

Samuel I Rosenberg, Steven B Soliman, Alex L Gornitzky, Ira Zaltz, Matthew J Hartwell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dynamic ultrasound of the hip.Skeletal radiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel I RosenbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Steven B SolimanDivision of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Alex L GornitzkyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ira ZaltzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Matthew J HartwellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. matthart@umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0095-1271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNon-arthritic hip pain is a common presentation among the general population, with many possible contributing etiologies. While radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging are all within the standard diagnostic workup, ultrasonography has emerged as a facile tool given its low cost, lack of radiation, and dynamic application. This article reviews the utility of ultrasound (US) in evaluation of non-arthritic hip pain and its ability to detect pathology both statically and dynamically in comparison and as an adjunct to standard imaging modalities. RECENT

findingsCurrent research highlights applications of US to commonly treated hip pathologies including femoroacetabular impingement, labral tears, hip microinstability, and various other extra-articular phenomena. While static evaluation seems to add similar value to that of radiography, several novel protocols have been developed that allow for dynamic evaluation of joint biomechanics, including extent and onset of impingement and femoral head translation, that cannot be assessed with more standard imaging modalities.

Indexed as

Dynamic hip evaluationFemoral head translationFemoroacetabular impingementFemoroacetabular joint biomechanicsMicroinstabilityNon-arthritic hip painUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39477906
PMCPMC11652547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.