Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477882›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Peritonitis-related bacterial infections: a large-scale case-series retrospective study in 160 domestic animals (2009-2022).

Márcio Garcia Ribeiro, Ana Beatriz da Silva Ribeiro, Ana Beatriz Matias da Silva, Gabriel Henrique Gomes Mariano, Larissa de Sá Teles Bertunes, Fábio Vinicius Ramos Portilho, Marcelo Fagali Arabe Filho, Thaís Spessotto Bello, Júlia Meira, Patrik Júnior de Lima Paz and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Márcio Garcia RibeiroDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil. marcio.ribeiro@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2682-9389
Ana Beatriz da Silva Ribeiro *Undergraduate Veterinary Medicine students, FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz Matias da Silva *Undergraduate Veterinary Medicine students, FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Gabriel Henrique Gomes Mariano *Undergraduate Veterinary Medicine students, FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Larissa de Sá Teles Bertunes *Undergraduate Veterinary Medicine students, FMVZ, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Fábio Vinicius Ramos PortilhoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Marcelo Fagali Arabe FilhoDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Thaís Spessotto BelloDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Júlia MeiraDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Patrik Júnior de Lima PazDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Amanda Keller SiqueiraSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Midwestern State University - UNICENTRO, Guarapuava, PR, Brazil.
Rodrigo Garcia MottaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Maringa State University, UEM, Umuarama campus, Umuarama, PR, Brazil.
Lorrayne de Souza Araújo Martins MottaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Paraná University, UNIPAR, Umuarama, PR, Brazil.
Amanda Bezerra BertoliniFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Eduvale, Avare, SP, Brazil.
Rogério GiuffridaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University of Western São Paulo - UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.
Aline Garcia CasteletiDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Fernando José Paganini ListoniDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.
Antonio Carlos PaesDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences- FMVZ, Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals, Sao Paulo State University - UNESP, Botucatu, SP, 18618-681, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial peritonitis infections comprise a life-threatening clinical condition in domestic animals that commonly lead to sepsis and high mortality. A set of bacterial pathogens have been identified in septic peritonitis in livestock and companion animals. Nonetheless, most descriptions are restricted to case reports or limited to only one domestic species, and a restrict number of comprehensive studies involving this infection has focused on a great number of domestic animals. Here, we retrospectively investigated selected epidemiological data (with an emphasis in outcome), clinical signs, bacteriological culturing, and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of microorganisms isolated of peritoneal fluid from 160 domestic animals (2009-2023) compatible with septic peritonitis. Bacteria were isolated from 71.9% (115/160) of the peritoneal fluid from 75 dogs (75/115 = 65.2%), 22 cats (22/115 = 19.1%), 14 horses (14/115 = 12.2%), and 4 cattle (4/115 = 3.5%). Among animals with bacterial isolation, Escherichia coli (34/115 = 29.6%), alfa-hemolytic Streptococcus (12/115 = 10.4%), Staphylococcus aureus (8/115 = 6.9%), beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (7/115 = 6.1%), and Pasteurella multocida (6/115 = 5.2%) were predominant in pure culture, in addition to a miscellaneous of other bacteria isolated in minor frequency, e.g., Pseudomonas sp., Trueperella pyogenes, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella sp. In general, in vitro susceptibility tests of isolates revealed that florfenicol, chloramphenicol, and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid showed moderate effectivity (≥ 60%). Conversely, most of isolates exhibited resistance mainly to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, enrofloxacin, and penicillin (> 60%). Additionally, multidrug resistance was found in 42.6% (49/115) of the isolates. Data related to the outcome were available in 37.4% (43/115) of animals that had bacterial isolation and, from these, the mortality rate was 79.1% (34/43), with a significant association (p < 0.036) between mortality and septic peritonitis by gram-negative bacteria. Neoplasia (7/43 = 16.3%), pneumonia/pulmonary abscess (5/43 = 11.6%), hepatitis (5/43 = 11.6%), metritis/pyometra (4/43 = 9.3%), and gall bladder rupture (3/43 = 7%) represented the probable main sources of septic peritonitis. Anorexia (34/115 = 29.6%), emesis (29/115 = 25.2%), lethargy (26/115 = 22.6%), respiratory distress (25/115 = 21.7%), ascites (20/115 = 17.4%), and fever (19/115 = 16.5%) were the most frequent clinical signs among animals with bacterial isolation. A variety of bacteria were isolated in the peritoneal fluid of animals, with a predominance of Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, and staphylococci, highlighting the opportunistic nature of the pathogens in septic peritonitis. High in vitro multidrug resistance of isolates and high mortality of animals reinforce the need for early diagnosis and therapy based on the in vitro antimicrobial profile of the pathogens involved in septic peritonitis. Our results contribute to the etiological characterization, clinical-epidemiological findings, and vigilance of multidrug-resistant bacteria in septic peritonitis among livestock and companion animals.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticBacteriaBacterial InfectionsPeritonitisAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCatsCattleDogsHorsesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCompanion animalsEtiologyLivestockMultidrug-resistant bacteriaOutcomePeritoneal infections

Identifiers

PMID39477882
PMCPMC11711992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.