Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477858›Full record

SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2024

Implementation of Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Service Settings for Youth: A Systematic Review.

Emma D Whitmyre, Christianne Esposito-Smythers, Roberto López, Debora G Goldberg, Freda Liu, Annamarie B Defayette

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma D WhitmyrePsychology Department, Children's National Hospital, 111 Michigan Avenue NW, Washington, D.C., 20010, USA. ewhitmyr@gmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3590-9567
Christianne Esposito-SmythersPsychology Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
Roberto LópezDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Debora G GoldbergPsychology Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
Freda LiuSchool of Medicine in Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Annamarie B DefayetteDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Suicide Prevention Research (supplement 2)T32MH020061 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI VAN ORDEN, KIMBERLY ALLISON · 2001 to 2025
$5.9M
NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH134361NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement-Based Care (MBC) is the systematic use of patient-reported data to inform care decisions and monitor treatment progress. MBC has been shown to improve patient outcomes across medical and mental health treatment settings for adults and youth. While many studies have examined the use of MBC in specific care settings, few have focused on the implementation of MBC among youth populations or across care settings. While a review has shown that use of MBC benefits youth, no published reviews exist that summarize the successful strategies and barriers to implementation models across studies in youth service settings. To address these gaps, the present systematic review (N = 25 studies) focuses on the implementation of MBC across four youth service settings, including outpatient mental health centers, medical centers/pediatric clinics, schools, and clinical psychology training clinics. Results suggest that few studies employ consistent implementation models or strategies to guide efforts. Further, there is significant overlap in the successful strategies employed as well as the barriers to implementation of MBC across youth service settings, at the client, clinician, and organizational levels. Broadly, the authors recommend on the basis of findings that future implementation work in youth service settings: incorporate comprehensive training in the use of MBC for clinicians; incorporate stakeholder feedback into the implementation process for initial and sustained use; employ digital measurement feedback systems to deliver MBC that allow for real-time feedback and continuous technical support; and employ a health equity lens in implementation efforts to help address disparities in access to and use of MBC so that all youth and families may benefit from this evidence-based practice.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesAdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesChildHumansMental DisordersPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresBarriersImplementationMeasurement-based careYouth

Identifiers

PMID39477858
PMCPMC11609122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.