Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477557›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. HIV2024

Initiation and continued use of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis among pregnant and postpartum women in South Africa (PrEP-PP): a demonstration cohort study.

Dvora Leah Joseph Davey, Rufaro Mvududu, Nyiko Mashele, Kalisha Bheemraj, Nehaa Khadka, Leigh F Johnson, Sarah Schoetz Dean, Pamina Gorbach, Linda-Gail Bekker, Thomas J Coates and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. HIV, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The time is now to use the tools we have to end AIDS in children.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Retention of clients in HIV oral pre-exposure prophylaxis care in Engela, Namibia.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dvora Leah Joseph DaveyDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: djosephdavey@mednet.ucla.edu.
Rufaro MvududuDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nyiko MasheleDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kalisha BheemrajDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Nehaa KhadkaDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Leigh F JohnsonCentre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sarah Schoetz DeanDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Pamina GorbachDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Linda-Gail BekkerThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Thomas J CoatesDivision of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Landon MyerDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Evaluating the PrEP cascade in HIV-negative pregnant and breastfeeding women in South Africa (PrEP-PP)R01MH116771 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOSEPH DAVEY, DVORA LEAH, MYER, BENJAMIN LANDON · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Evaluation of pre-exposure prophylaxis cascade in pregnant and breastfeeding women in Cape Town, South AfricaK01TW011187 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI JOSEPH DAVEY, DVORA LEAH · 2018 to 2022
$698k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW011187NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH116771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen used effectively, oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP; tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine) prevents maternal HIV acquisition and reduces the risk of vertical transmission. Our study aimed to better understand PrEP initiation, continued use, and adherence in pregnant and postpartum women.

methodsThe PrEP in Pregnancy and Postpartum (PrEP-PP) study is a demonstration cohort study that enrolled pregnant women aged 16 years and older without HIV attending their first antenatal care visit in Cape Town, South Africa, between Aug 29, 2019, and Oct 10, 2021. Eligible, consenting women were followed up quarterly up to 12 months postpartum with regular HIV testing and offer of PrEP with ongoing adherence counselling. The primary outcome was distribution of women across the PrEP cascade (ie, initiation and continuation up to 12 months postpartum) with crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). We also report on HIV incidence by pregnancy and postpartum status.

findingsOverall, 1195 pregnant women were recruited and followed up (median age 26 years, IQR 23-31; median gestational age 21 weeks, IQR 15-31); 1009 (84·4%) started PrEP at enrolment. Among women who initiated PrEP at enrolment, 668 (67·5%) of 990 continued PrEP at the 1-month follow-up, 485 (49·9%) of 972 continued at 3 months, 392 (39·4%) of 994 at 6 months, and 275 (27·4%) of 1005 at 12 months. Of 186 women who did not accept PrEP at enrolment, 70 (37·6%) of 186 subsequently initiated PrEP. Overall, 200 (18·6%) of 1076 women continued PrEP at 12 months postpartum. Of 186 women who did not initiate PrEP at baseline, 70 (37·6%) subsequently initiated PrEP during the study. Factors associated with PrEP discontinuation up to 12 months postpartum included being married or cohabiting (adjusted HR 1·32, 95% CI 1·16-1·50), condomless sex since last visit (1·43, 1·23-1·65), reporting intimate partner violence (2·03, 1·59-2·59), or depression in the past 12 months (1·53, 1·14-2·05). Overall, 16 women seroconverted over 1673·8 woman-years (HIV incidence rate 0·96 per 100 woman-years, 95% CI 0·49-1·42); 14 discontinued PrEP use and two never initiated PrEP. HIV incidence was 0·28 per 100 woman-years during pregnancy (95% CI 0·22-0·33), and the incidence rate ratio was 1·77 per 100 woman-years (0·53-5·90) 0-6 months postpartum and 2·19 per 100 woman-years (0·61-7·83) 6-12 months postpartum compared with pregnant women.

interpretationThere is an urgent need for the integration of PrEP into antenatal and postnatal care and interventions that address barriers to continued use, including targeted counselling during pregnancy and postpartum to reduce PrEP discontinuation.

fundingNational Institute of Mental Health and Fogarty International, US National Institutes of Health. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPostpartum PeriodPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesDrug MonitoringEmtricitabineFemaleHumansIncidenceInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID39477557
PMCPMC13444643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.