Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477506›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025

The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.

Tomoyuki Fujioka, Shohei Fujita, Daiju Ueda, Rintaro Ito, Mariko Kawamura, Yasutaka Fushimi, Takahiro Tsuboyama, Masahiro Yanagawa, Akira Yamada, Fuminari Tatsugami and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tomoyuki FujiokaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shohei FujitaDepartment of Radiology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daiju UedaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Rintaro ItoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Mariko KawamuraDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Yasutaka FushimiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Takahiro TsuboyamaDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Masahiro YanagawaDepartment of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Akira YamadaMedical Data Science Course, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Fuminari TatsugamiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
Koji KamagataDepartment of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiki NozakiDepartment of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke MatsuiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Okayama, Japan.
Noriyuki FujimaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kenji HirataDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi NakauraDepartment of Central Radiology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, Japan.
Ukihide TateishiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinji NaganawaDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of deep learning (DL) in breast MRI has revolutionized the field of medical imaging, notably enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This review discusses the substantial influence of DL technologies across various facets of breast MRI, including image reconstruction, classification, object detection, segmentation, and prediction of clinical outcomes such as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence of breast cancer. Utilizing sophisticated models such as convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, and generative adversarial networks, DL has improved image quality and precision, enabling more accurate differentiation between benign and malignant lesions and providing deeper insights into disease behavior and treatment responses. DL's predictive capabilities for patient-specific outcomes also suggest potential for more personalized treatment strategies. The advancements in DL are pioneering a new era in breast cancer diagnostics, promising more personalized and effective healthcare solutions. Nonetheless, the integration of this technology into clinical practice faces challenges, necessitating further research, validation, and development of legal and ethical frameworks to fully leverage its potential.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingBreastFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computerartificial intelligencebreastdeep learningmagnetic resonance imagingneural network

Identifiers

PMID39477506
PMCPMC12557883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.