ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Association of Mayo Adhesive Probability Score With Perioperative Outcomes and Histological Characteristics of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The predictive value of Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) score for perioperative outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Mayo adhesive probability score predicts perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomyGland surgery · 2024Article
- Predictive Performance of ADRENAL and MAP Scores for Complications in Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
- Clinical Outcomes of Adrenalectomy for Metastatic Adrenal Tumor: A 30-case Single-center Study.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimTo evaluate the difficulty of laparoscopic adrenalectomy by investigating the usefulness of the Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score for assessing adherent perinephric fat and its correlation with histological reality. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 103 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomies. Based on preoperative computed tomography images, the patients were categorized into two groups: high (3-5 points) and low MAP (0-2 points). Clinical characteristics and perioperative data were compared between the two groups. Additionally, we analyzed the pathological tissue of the tumor and surrounding fat using hematoxylin-eosin-saffron staining.
resultsCompared with the low MAP group, the high MAP group had younger patients (59 vs. 62 years, p=0.097), more male patients (93.3% vs. 44.3%, p<0.001), and higher body mass indices (26.4 vs. 23.8, kg/m
conclusionPatients with a preoperative MAP score ≥3, pheochromocytoma, or malignant tumor had a high risk of increased intraoperative blood loss. Strict perioperative management should be performed in such cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.