Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477430›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

PSMA PET/CT Accuracy in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer Nodes Metastases.

Pietro Pepe, Ludovica Pepe, Vincenzo Fiorentino, Mara Curduman, Michele Pennisi, Filippo Fraggetta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [The Prostate · 2026
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pietro PepeUrology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy; piepepe@hotmail.com.
Ludovica PepeDepartment of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Vincenzo FiorentinoDepartment of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Mara CurdumanPathology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Michele PennisiUrology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Filippo FraggettaPathology Unit, ASP Catania, "Gravina" Hospital, Caltagirone, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in pelvic nodal staging, using postoperative histopathology data as the reference standard. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom January 2020 to June 2024, 78 patients with clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) (ISUP Grade Group 2) underwent radical prostatectomy plus extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND): 60 (77%) vs. 18 (23%) men had an intermediate vs. high risk PCa. All the patients underwent PSMA PET/TC before surgery for clinical staging and nodes focal uptake (standardized uptake value "SUVmax) was evaluated to rule out the presence of metastases.

resultsPSMA PET/CT was suspicious for nodes metastases in 16/78 (20.5%) men (median SUVmax 26.2), conversely, histology demonstrated nodes metastases in 18/78 (23.1%). PSMA PET/CT was negative for nodal involvement in all Grade Group 2 (GG2) PCa, positive in 4/4 (100%) GG3 PCa, and in 10/14 (71.4%) GG5 PCa. In detail, PSMA PET/CT was false negative in 2/4 PCa, characterized by GG5 plus ductal adenocarcinoma. Overall, PSMA PET/CT sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing nodal metastases were equal to 87.5, 96.8, 87.5 96.7, and 92.3%, respectively.

conclusionPSMA PET/CT demonstrated an overall diagnostic accuracy of 92.3% in nodal staging (100% in GG2 PCa), which decreased to 63.6% in GG5 PCa. In high-risk patients or in case of ductal adenocarcinoma, a negative PSMA PET/CT does not rule out the need for ePLND.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAntigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIextended PNLDnodes metastasesprostate cancerPSMA PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID39477430
PMCPMC11535925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.