Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477346›Full record

ReviewVox sanguinis2025

Securing commitment and control for the supply of plasma derivatives for public health systems. I: A short review of the global landscape.

Leni von Bonsdorff, Albert Farrugia, Fabio Candura, Peter O'Leary, Miguel A Vesga, Vincenzo De Angelis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vox sanguinis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leni von BonsdorffInternational Plasma and Fractionation Association, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Albert FarrugiaInternational Plasma and Fractionation Association, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-7463
Fabio CanduraNational Blood Centre, Rome, Italy.
Peter O'LearyEuropean Blood Alliance, Brussels, Belgium.
Miguel A VesgaBasque Center for Blood and Tissues, Galdakao-Vizcaya, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9446-0715
Vincenzo De AngelisNational Blood Centre, Rome, Italy.

Funding

European Union's EU4Health Programme (2021-2027) 101056988/SUPPLY
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social market economies of the Western world considered the provision of plasma derivatives produced from publicly owned blood services as a legitimate state commitment and, until the last decades of the 20th century, many of the relevant jurisdictions maintained state-supported fractionation plants to convert publicly collected plasma into products for the public health system. This situation started to change in the 1990s, because of several converging factors, and currently, publicly owned/subsidized, not-for-profit fractionation activity has shrunk to a handful of players. However, the collection of plasma from publicly owned blood services has continued and recent developments have increased the interest of state authorities globally to increase the volume of plasma collected to increase the level of strategic independence in the supply of crucial plasma-derived medicines from commercial market pressures, particularly the global for-profit fractionation sector with its dominance of source plasma from paid donors in the United States. This paper reviews the development of the plasma industry and the evolution of the pressures on the supply of plasma, which has led to a situation of scarcity of key plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs).

Indexed as

PlasmaPublic HealthHumansfractionationimmunoglobulinplasmasupply

Identifiers

PMID39477346
PMCPMC11839246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.