ReviewVox sanguinis2025
Securing commitment and control for the supply of plasma derivatives for public health systems. I: A short review of the global landscape.
Review in Vox sanguinis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma donation rates and infection risk: A multicentre observational study in Denmark.Vox sanguinis · 2026Observational
- Protection of fundamental human rights by improving patient access to plasma-derived therapies and donor health protection.Vox sanguinis · 2026Review
- Article
- Securing commitment and control for the supply of plasma derivatives for public health systems. I: A short review of the global landscape.Vox sanguinis · 2025Review
- Securing commitment and control for the supply of plasma derivatives for public health systems. II: A survey of national pathways.Vox sanguinis · 2025Article
- [Strategic independence: a value model for improving access to plasma-derived medicines in Latin AmericaIndependência estratégica: modelo de valor para melhorar o acesso a hemoderivados na América Latina].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Plasma pathways for Low and Middle Income Countries - needed more than ever.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangueArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The social market economies of the Western world considered the provision of plasma derivatives produced from publicly owned blood services as a legitimate state commitment and, until the last decades of the 20th century, many of the relevant jurisdictions maintained state-supported fractionation plants to convert publicly collected plasma into products for the public health system. This situation started to change in the 1990s, because of several converging factors, and currently, publicly owned/subsidized, not-for-profit fractionation activity has shrunk to a handful of players. However, the collection of plasma from publicly owned blood services has continued and recent developments have increased the interest of state authorities globally to increase the volume of plasma collected to increase the level of strategic independence in the supply of crucial plasma-derived medicines from commercial market pressures, particularly the global for-profit fractionation sector with its dominance of source plasma from paid donors in the United States. This paper reviews the development of the plasma industry and the evolution of the pressures on the supply of plasma, which has led to a situation of scarcity of key plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.