Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477343›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2024

Predicting troponin biomarker elevation from electrocardiograms using a deep neural network.

Lukas Hilgendorf, Petur Petursson, Vibha Gupta, Truls Ramunddal, Erik Andersson, Peter Lundgren, Christian Dworeck, Charlotta Ljungman, Jan Boren, Aidin Rawshani and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lukas HilgendorfDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden lukas.hilgendorf@gu.se.ORCID 0009-0000-9518-3644
Petur PeturssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Vibha GuptaDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Truls RamunddalDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Erik AnderssonDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Peter LundgrenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Christian DworeckDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Charlotta LjungmanDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Jan BorenDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.
Aidin RawshaniDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Elmir OmerovicDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3875-8621
Gustav SmithDepartment of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden.
Zacharias MandalenakisDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
Kristofer SkoglundDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9095-1218
Araz RawshaniDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElevated troponin levels are a sensitive biomarker for cardiac injury. The quick and reliable prediction of troponin elevation for patients with chest pain from readily available ECGs may pose a valuable time-saving diagnostic tool during decision-making concerning this patient population. METHODS AND

resultsThe data used included 15 856 ECGs from patients presenting to the emergency rooms with chest pain or dyspnoea at two centres in Sweden from 2015 to June 2023. All patients had high-sensitivity troponin test results within 6 hours after 12-lead ECG. Both troponin I (TnI) and TnT were used, with biomarker-specific cut-offs and sex-specific cut-offs for TnI. On this dataset, a residual convolutional neural network (ResNet) was trained 10 times, each on a unique split of the data. The final model achieved an average area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.7717 (95% CI±0.0052), calibration curve analysis revealed a mean slope of 1.243 (95% CI±0.075) and intercept of -0.073 (95% CI±0.034), indicating a good correlation between prediction and ground truth. Post-classification, tuned for F1 score, accuracy was 71.43% (95% CI±1.28), with an F1 score of 0.5642 (95% CI±0.0052) and a negative predictive value of 0.8660 (95% CI±0.0048), respectively. The ResNet displayed comparable or surpassing metrics to prior presented models.

conclusionThe model exhibited clinically meaningful performance, notably its high negative predictive accuracy. Therefore, clinical use of comparable neural networks in first-line, quick-response triage of patients with chest pain or dyspnoea appears as a valuable option in future medical practice.

Indexed as

BiomarkersElectrocardiographyNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsAgedChest PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSwedenTroponin ITroponin TBiomarkersTroponin ITroponin TAcute Coronary SyndromeChest PainCoronary Artery Disease

Identifiers

PMID39477343
PMCPMC11529765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.