Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477336›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

The PHA4GE Microbial Data-Sharing Accord: establishing baseline consensus microbial data-sharing norms to facilitate cross-sectoral collaboration.

Emma J Griffiths, Peter van Heusden, Tsaone Tamuhla, Eddie T Lulamba, Anja Bedeker, Michelle Nichols, Alan Christoffels, Nicki Tiffin, Public Health Alliance for Genomic Epidemiology (PHA4GE) Ethics and Data Sharing Working Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emma J GriffithsSimon Fraser University Faculty of Health Sciences, Burnaby, Ottawa, Canada.
Peter van HeusdenSouth African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit, South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Tsaone TamuhlaSouth African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit, South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Eddie T LulambaSouth African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit, South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Anja BedekerSouth African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit, South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Michelle NicholsCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Alan ChristoffelsSouth African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit, South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0420-2916
Nicki TiffinSouth African Medical Research Council Bioinformatics Unit, South African National Bioinformatics Institute, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa ntiffin@uwc.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5083-2735
Public Health Alliance for Genomic Epidemiology (PHA4GE) Ethics and Data Sharing Working Group

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial data sharing underlies evidence-based microbial research, as well as pathogen surveillance and analysis essential to public health. While the need for data sharing was highlighted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, some concerns regarding secondary data use have also surfaced. Although general guidelines are available for data sharing, we note the absence of a set of established, universal, unambiguous and accessible principles to guide the secondary use of microbial data. Here, we propose the Public Health Alliance for Genomic Epidemiology (PHA4GE) Microbial Data-Sharing Accord to consolidate consensus norms and accepted practices for the secondary use of microbial data. The Accord provides a set of seven simple, baseline principles to address key concerns that may arise for researchers providing microbial datasets for secondary use and to guide responsible use by data users. By providing clear rules for secondary use of microbial data, the Accord can increase confidence in sharing by data providers and protect against data mis-use during secondary analyses.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationPublic HealthConsensusCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Medical microbiology

Identifiers

PMID39477336
PMCPMC11529761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.