Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477268›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Safety and efficacy of personalised versus standard dosing of linezolid in patients with sepsis (SePkLin): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, controlled and superiority clinical trial protocol.

Enrique Bandín-Vilar, Ana Estany-Gestal, Teresa Cabaleiro, Eva Rial-Pensado, Ana Castro-Balado, Iria Varela-Rey, Cristina Mondelo-García, Francisco Cajade-Pascual, María Teresa Rodríguez-Jato, Irene Zarra-Ferro and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Enrique Bandín-VilarFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ana Estany-GestalResearch Methodology Unit, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Teresa CabaleiroResearch Methodology Unit, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Eva Rial-PensadoResearch Methodology Unit, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ana Castro-BaladoFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Iria Varela-ReyFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Cristina Mondelo-GarcíaFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Francisco Cajade-PascualFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2996-8405
María Teresa Rodríguez-JatoPharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Irene Zarra-FerroFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María Teresa Rey-RiloDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, University Clinical Hospital of A Coruña (CHUAC), A Coruña, Spain.
Jorge Arca-SuárezMicrobiology Department and Health Research Insitute A Coruña (INIBIC), University Clinical Hospital of A Coruña (CHUAC), A Coruña, Spain.
María Sandra Albiñana-PérezPharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of A Coruña (CHUAC), A Coruña, Spain.
Pedro Rascado-SedesIntensive Care Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Antonio Pose-ReinoInternal Medicine Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Luis ValdésPneumology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Manuel Taboada-MuñizDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Gema Barbeito-CastiñeirasDepartment of Microbiology, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Álvaro Mena de CeaService of Infectious Internal Medicine, University Clinical Hospital of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Enrique Alemparte-PardavilaIntensive Care Unit, University Clinical Hospital of A Coruña (CHUAC), A Coruña, Spain.
Anxo Fernández-FerreiroFarmaCHUSLab Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain anxordes@gmail.com.
SePkLin Study GroupConsellería de Sanidade e o Servizo Galego de Saúde, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLinezolid is a broadly used antibiotic to treat complicated infections caused by gram-positive bacteria. Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid concentrations is recommended to maximise its efficacy and safety, mainly haematological toxicity. Different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets have been proposed to improve linezolid exposure: the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve during a 24-hour period to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) between 80 and 120; percentage of time that the drug concentration remains above the MIC during a dosing interval greater than 85% and the trough concentration between 2 and 7 mg/L. This clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy and the clinical and economic utility of personalised dosing of linezolid using Bayesian forecasting methods to attain pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, known as model-informed precision dosing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, parallel, controlled, phase IV and low intervention trial. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to each group (n=346 per group). Control group will receive the standard dose of linezolid. Intervention group will receive personalised dosage of linezolid based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic adjustments. The primary outcome will be the incidence of thrombocytopenia in both groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Investigation with Medicines of Galicia (code 2022/140) and authorised by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices. The trial is implemented in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the international ethical and scientific quality standard, the Good Clinical Practice. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT registration code: 2022-000144-30.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidSepsisBayes TheoremDrug MonitoringEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPrecision MedicineAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidAdult intensive & critical careCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYDrug TherapyINFECTIOUS DISEASES

Identifiers

PMID39477268
PMCPMC11529615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.