ArticleBMJ open2024
Efficacy of problem-solving therapy in treating late-life depression with potential cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of group versus individual reminiscence therapy for depression in older adults: A network meta-analysis stratified by severity.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Recent Advances in Multimodal Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Late-Life Depression.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLate-life depression (LLD) is a global public health issue, often accompanied by cognitive impairments that can exacerbate the severity of depression and impair social functioning. Despite being a well-established treatment for LLD, the suitability of problem-solving therapy (PST) for individuals with LLD and varying degrees of cognitive impairments warrants further investigation. This paper presents the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and acceptability of PST for this specific demographic. METHODS/ANALYSIS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we will conduct a systematic review to synthesise existing research on PST for individuals in this demographic. We will comprehensively search multiple databases and sources, including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database and APA PsycNET from inception to October 2023, without language, publication year or type restrictions. Relevant studies will be manually screened from the references. Only RCTs involving PST for LLD will be included. The primary efficacy outcome will be the standardised mean difference in total scores on continuous depression severity scales across different comparison arms. Data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers (CH and J-JW), and methodological rigour will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to investigate the impact of concomitant cognitive impairments and to evaluate the robustness of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The meta-analysis project is expected to be ethically unproblematic and does not require approval from a research ethics committee. The results of this study will be shared through articles in scholarly peer-reviewed journals and presentations in various formats, both print and digital. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023473782.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.