Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477247›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2024

The Leaders in Informatics, Quality, and Systems (LInQS) Fellowship.

Heather Hallman, Jonathan Pell, P Michael Ho, Brian Montague, Lisa Schilling, Amber Sieja, Karen Ream, Tyler Anstett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heather HallmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Jonathan PellDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
P Michael HoDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Brian MontagueDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Lisa SchillingDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Amber SiejaDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Karen ReamDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.
Tyler AnstettDepartment of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeaders in Informatics, Quality, and Systems (LInQS) is a non-ACGME (Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education)-accredited 2-year training program developed to enhance training in the fields of health care delivery, quality improvement (QI), clinical informatics, and leadership.

methodsThis single-institution 2-year longitudinal training program grounded in QI and informed by leadership and clinical informatics includes didactics, coaching, and mentorship, all centered around individualized QI projects. The program has been available to sub-specialty fellows, advanced practice providers, and physicians.

resultsFrom 2019 to 2023, 32 fellows have been accepted into the program with 13 graduates and 16 currently enrolled. Fellows have been predominately female, physicians, and from multiple specialties but predominantly hospital medicine. Fellows' evaluations of the fellowship are highly positive, rating the didactics and mentorship aspects of the curriculum most favorably. Most fellows' projects utilized informatics solutions including clinical decision support tools to increase quality of care, improve patient outcomes, and reduce costs of care resulting in manuscript publications, national presentations, and a national specialty society award. Since matriculation, 50% of fellows received certification as Epic Physician Builders and 34% received leadership positions in clinical informatics, quality, and education.

conclusionOur experience supports the need to provide health care providers more expansive training in the areas of QI, clinical informatics, and leadership for improving health care delivery. Additional in-depth knowledge and experience in these fields may produce and benefit leaders in these fields.

Indexed as

Fellowships and ScholarshipsLeadershipMedical InformaticsCurriculumHumansQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID39477247
PMCPMC11524752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.