Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477243›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024

Type I MET inhibitors cooperate with PD-1 blockade to promote rejection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ricardo DeAzevedo, Madeline Steiner, Broderick X Turner, Arthur Liu, Sherwin Newton, Joanna Schmidt, Rachel Fleming, Angelica Tolentino, Ahmed O Kaseb, Michael A Curran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ricardo DeAzevedoDepartment of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Madeline SteinerDepartment of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Broderick X TurnerDepartment of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arthur LiuDepartment of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sherwin NewtonDepartment of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Joanna SchmidtIonis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
Rachel FlemingIonis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
Angelica TolentinoIonis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, California, USA.
Ahmed O KasebDepartment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael A CurranDepartment of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA mcurran@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0003-4996-7207

Funding

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Hepatocellular CarcinomaP50CA217674 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BERETTA, LAURA, KASEB, AHMED · 2019 to 2023
$11.3M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA217674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blockade of the immune checkpoints programmed death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen 4 has improved outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet most still fail to achieve objective clinical benefit. MET plays key roles in both HCC tumorigenesis and immunosuppressive conditioning; however, inhibition of MET causes upregulation of PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) suggesting the use of these inhibitors in the context of PD-1 blockade. We sought to investigate across the Hepa1-6, HCA-1 and diethylnitrosamine (DEN) models of HCC whether the combination of more specific type I versus more pleiotropic type II MET inhibitors would confer superior outcomes in combination with PD-1 blockade. While MET inhibition demonstrated cooperativity with αPD-1 across all three models, the type I MET inhibitor capmatinib showed optimal activity in combination and statistically significantly outperformed the combination with the type II inhibitor cabozantinib in the αPD-1 refractory DEN model. In both HCA-1 and DEN HCC, the capmatinib and αPD-1 combination enhanced CD8 T cell frequency and activation state while limiting intratumoral myeloid immune suppression. In vitro studies of antigen-specific T cell activation reveal significantly less inhibition of effector cytokine production and proliferation by capmatinib versus by type II or type III MET inhibitors. These findings suggest significant potential for clinical HCC combination studies of type I MET inhibitors and PD-1 blockade where prior trials using type II inhibitors have yielded limited benefit.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metAnimalsBenzamidesCell Line, TumorHumansImidazolesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMiceProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorPyridinesTriazinesBenzamidescapmatinibImidazolesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMET protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metPyridinesTriazinesCombination TherapyHepatocellular CarcinomaImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39477243
PMCPMC11529525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.