Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477241›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.

David Green, Angela Pietrafesa, Marianne Reyes, Giada Donnini, Evelyn Gicana, Evelyn Nadurata, Juniya John, Jessica Ponting, Raji Srinivasan, Udaya Prabhakar Udayaraj

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-producing shared wound care education: experiences of service users and healthcare professionals.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David GreenChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-9572-9853
Angela PietrafesaChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Marianne ReyesChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Giada DonniniChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Evelyn GicanaChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Evelyn NadurataChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Juniya JohnChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Jessica PontingChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Raji SrinivasanChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK.
Udaya Prabhakar UdayarajChurchill Hospital Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford, UK udaya.udayaraj@ouh.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adults receiving centre-based haemodialysis (HD) have low levels of patient activation which are associated with poorer outcomes. Shared haemodialysis care (SHC) describes an intervention whereby individuals are supported to undertake elements of their treatment to improve their activation levels and promote better self-care. This project aimed to increase the proportion of those performing SHC in seven HD centres within the Oxford Kidney Unit's catchment area. Sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles effected change first in two central HD centres, in cycles 1 and 2, before rolling out to five satellite HD centres, in cycles 3 and 4. Cycle 1 explored and transformed staff perceptions regarding SHC using a questionnaire and teaching sessions while in cycle 2, staff partnered with patients to develop leaflets and noticeboards to improve awareness and participation. These interventions were then rolled out to the remaining HD centres in PDSA cycles 3 and 4. Other interventions included: Enrolling staff and patients in virtual training courses; designating SHC 'Champions'; engagement with a national SHC forum; and changes to the electronic patient record to enable the monitoring of patient SHC opportunity and to promote sustainable change. Outcome measurement data on the number of patients performing SHC and the number at different defined stages of SHC competency were captured monthly. In April 2022, only 4% (19/483) of those receiving centre-based HD performed any aspect of SHC. By the end of the project in December 2023, this had increased to 43% (220/511). There was a significant and sustained growth in the stage of patient SHC competency as well as the number of patients performing SHC in each HD centre. The project demonstrated that it is possible to implement, scale-up and maintain a multisite SHC programme even with little baseline staff and patient SHC experience.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdultFemaleHumansMaleSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthcare quality improvementPatient-centred carePatient educationQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID39477241
PMCPMC11529755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.