ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-producing shared wound care education: experiences of service users and healthcare professionals.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Clinical insights on "Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions on implementing home hemodialysis and self-assisted hemodialysis: a qualitative explorative study".International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions on implementing home hemodialysis and self-assisted hemodialysis: a qualitative explorative study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the "Patient Activation Measure".Kidney international reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adults receiving centre-based haemodialysis (HD) have low levels of patient activation which are associated with poorer outcomes. Shared haemodialysis care (SHC) describes an intervention whereby individuals are supported to undertake elements of their treatment to improve their activation levels and promote better self-care. This project aimed to increase the proportion of those performing SHC in seven HD centres within the Oxford Kidney Unit's catchment area. Sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles effected change first in two central HD centres, in cycles 1 and 2, before rolling out to five satellite HD centres, in cycles 3 and 4. Cycle 1 explored and transformed staff perceptions regarding SHC using a questionnaire and teaching sessions while in cycle 2, staff partnered with patients to develop leaflets and noticeboards to improve awareness and participation. These interventions were then rolled out to the remaining HD centres in PDSA cycles 3 and 4. Other interventions included: Enrolling staff and patients in virtual training courses; designating SHC 'Champions'; engagement with a national SHC forum; and changes to the electronic patient record to enable the monitoring of patient SHC opportunity and to promote sustainable change. Outcome measurement data on the number of patients performing SHC and the number at different defined stages of SHC competency were captured monthly. In April 2022, only 4% (19/483) of those receiving centre-based HD performed any aspect of SHC. By the end of the project in December 2023, this had increased to 43% (220/511). There was a significant and sustained growth in the stage of patient SHC competency as well as the number of patients performing SHC in each HD centre. The project demonstrated that it is possible to implement, scale-up and maintain a multisite SHC programme even with little baseline staff and patient SHC experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.