Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477157›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2024

Hospital at home - developing a simulation induction programme for junior doctors.

Gareth Watson, Amelia Paveley, Katherine Chin, Alexandra Lindsay-Perez, Rebekah Schiff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gareth WatsonDepartment of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Amelia PaveleyDepartment of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katherine ChinDepartment of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alexandra Lindsay-PerezPopulation Health Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rebekah SchiffDepartment of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Faculty and Life Sciences and Medicine, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rebekah.schiff@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital at Home (HaH) provides hospital-level care within patients' homes. With services expanding, a London HaH service embedded new junior doctor posts. Currently, gaps exist in the under- and postgraduate curriculum to develop clinical skills required to deliver care in this context. HaH simulation (HaH-SIM) was developed, through a multi-cycle QIP, to improve early-career doctors' confidence in providing care in this unfamiliar environment. Surveys before and after HaH-SIM assessed confidence in practical, clinical and communication skills; ranked concerns; rated sessions and gained qualitative feedback. 41 doctors participated over 2 years. It currently includes six low-fidelity stations and three high-fidelity stations. Confidence improved, particularly in managing end of life, decision-making around hospital admission and administering intravenous medications/fluids. High-fidelity scenarios, practical skills and prescribing stations were most highly rated. As HaH services expand, HaH-SIM is a feasible, effective and transferable way of improving early-career doctors' confidence and skills to provide care in patients' homes.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMedical Staff, HospitalCurriculumHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHumansLondonSimulation TrainingSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity medicineHospital at homeMedical educationPostgraduate trainingSimulation

Identifiers

PMID39477157
PMCPMC11607645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.