Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477150›Full record

Trial reportJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2025

The VIVID trial 12-month outcomes of the venous stent for the iliofemoral vein using the Duo venous stent system.

Mahmood Razavi, Michael Lichtenberg, Kush Desai, David Dexter, Peter Soukas, Nicolas Shammas, Ankur Lodha, Paul Gagne, Anna Nordell, Raghu Kolluri and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mahmood RazaviDepartment of Interventional Radiology, St. Joseph Heart and Vascular Center, Orange, CA. Electronic address: mrazavi@pacbell.net.
Michael LichtenbergDepartment of Angiology, Vascular Center Arnsberg, Arnsberg.
Kush DesaiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
David DexterDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Sentara Vascular Specialists, Norfolk, VA.
Peter SoukasDepartment of Cardiology, Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI.
Nicolas ShammasDepartment of Cardiology, Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Davenport, IA.
Ankur LodhaDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute of the South - Lafayette, Lafayette, LA.
Paul GagneDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Vascular Care Connecticut, Darien, CT.
Anna NordellDepartment of Core Lab, Technomics Research, Long Lake, MN.
Raghu KolluriDepartment of Core lab, Ohio Health Heart and Vascular, Columbus, OH.
Mark GarciaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Endovascular Consultants, Wilmington, NC.
VIVID Trial Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere are varying anatomical and mechanical demands of stent placement in the iliofemoral venous segment; the Duo Venous Stent System is designed to address these issues. The purpose of the VIVID (Venous stent for the Iliofemoral Vein Investigational clinical trial using the Duo Venous Stent System) study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Duo Venous Stent System for the treatment of patients with nonmalignant iliofemoral venous obstructive disease.

methodsThis was an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm study that enrolled patients with symptomatic nonthrombotic (NT), post-thrombotic (PTS), or acute deep vein thrombotic (aDVT) iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. The primary safety end point was freedom from major adverse events at 30 days after the index procedure. The primary efficacy end point was primary patency of stent-bearing segments at 12 months. Secondary and observational end points included symptom relief, primary-assisted patency, secondary patency, and device success. Patients remain in follow-up for 36 months.

resultsA total of 162 patients were enrolled at 30 sites in the United States and Poland. The primary safety end point was achieved in 98.7% of patients against a predefined performance goal of 89.0% (P < .0001). The primary safety end point was achieved in 100%, 95.0%, and 100% of the NT, PTS, and aDVT cohorts, respectively. The primary efficacy end point was met in 90.2% compared with the performance goal of 77.3% (P = .0002). Primary patency was observed in 95.2% of patients with NT disease, 79.4% of those with PTS, and 86.7% of those with aDVT. No stent fracture, migration, or embolization occurred through 12 months. Patient-reported outcomes showed improvements in Venous Clinical Severity Score, Villalta, EQ-5D-3L, and VEINES-QoL/Sym scores from baseline through 6 and 12 months.

conclusionsThrough 12 months, the Duo Venous Stent System is safe and effective for the treatment of nonmalignant iliofemoral venous obstructive disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The VIVID (Venous stent for the Iliofemoral Vein Investigational clinical trial using the Duo Venous Stent System) investigational device exemption trial is the first study of a hybrid, venous stent specifically designed to address the anatomic challenges of the iliofemoral venous system. The Duo Venous Stent System consists of a self-expanding nitinol Duo Hybrid Stent used independently or in conjunction with the flexible extension Duo Extend Stent. This is the first report of primary outcomes from the VIVID Study, assessing the safety and efficacy of the Duo Venous Stent System to treat patients with nonmalignant, symptomatic iliofemoral venous outflow obstruction. The Duo Venous Stent System successfully met its 12-month safety and effectiveness performance goals.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresFemoral VeinIliac VeinPostthrombotic SyndromeStentsVenous ThrombosisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignTime FactorsDuo Venous Stent SystemIliofemoral venous obstructive diseasePatencyQuality of lifeSafety

Identifiers

PMID39477150
PMCPMC12014339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.