ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2025
Uncertainty-Aware Deep Learning Characterization of Knee Radiographs for Large-Scale Registry Creation.
Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe present an automated image ingestion pipeline for a knee radiography registry, integrating a multilabel image-semantic classifier with conformal prediction-based uncertainty quantification and an object detection model for knee hardware.
methodsAnnotators retrospectively classified 26,000 knee images detailing presence, laterality, prostheses, and radiographic views. They further annotated surgical construct locations in 11,841 knee radiographs. An uncertainty-aware multilabel EfficientNet-based classifier was trained to identify the knee laterality, implants, and radiographic view. A classifier trained with embeddings from the EfficientNet model detected out-of-domain images. An object detection model was trained to identify 20 different knee implants. Model performance was assessed against a held-out internal and an external dataset using per-class F1 score, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Conformal prediction was evaluated with marginal coverage and efficiency.
resultsClassification Model with Conformal Prediction: F1 scores for each label output > 0.98. Coverage of each label output was > 0.99 and the average efficiency was 0.97. Domain Detection Model:The F1 score was 0.99, with precision and recall for knee radiographs of 0.99. Object Detection Model:Mean average precision across all classes was 0.945 and ranged from 0.695 to 1.000. Average precision and recall across all classes were 0.950 and 0.886.
conclusionsWe present a multilabel classifier with domain detection and an object detection model to characterize knee radiographs. Conformal prediction enhances transparency in cases when the model is uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.