ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2024
Perceptions of reproductive risk among women with epilepsy of childbearing age.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHaving children or planning to have children may raise many questions for women with epilepsy. Seizures and antiseizure medications (ASMs) impact contraception, fetal/early childhood development, and maternal health. Little is known regarding patients' perspectives about reproductive risk and how those perspectives influence reproductive decision-making.
methodsAs a quality improvement initiative, we distributed an electronic survey within our health system to women ages 21-45 with a primary diagnosis of epilepsy/seizures. We then performed an exploratory research study to investigate perceptions of risk of epilepsy and ASMs on reproductive health and decision making. Additionally, we looked at clinical characteristics as possible predictors of fear impacting reproductive decisions.
resultsThere were 267 responses (32% responder rate); after exclusion criteria, 233 respondents were included in the study. There were mixed responses about how fear of ASM teratogenicity impacted decisions about having children (33% very much, 34% a little, 33% not at all). While 45% responded that fear of having a child with epilepsy/seizures did not at all affect decisions about having children, for 24% this very much affected their decision. In total 42% of respondents reported they had had children. When we evaluated the impact of certain clinical characteristics, we found ASM number and valproic acid use impacted reproductive decision making, while other expected characteristics (e.g., drug-refractoriness and convulsive seizures) did not. DISCUSSION: We found variation in perceptions of risk. Overall, our data support the very personalized nature of preferences and the need for individualized counseling when guiding patients in reproductive decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.